Eighth Circuit: S. Dakota's 1-Year Filing Deadlines for Ballot Initiatives Violate First Amendment
The Eighth Circuit has affirmed the grant of a permanent injunction against the enforcement of South Dakota's one-year filing deadlines for submitting petitions to initiate state statutes and to amend the state's constitution, holding that both statutory deadlines violate the First Amendment.
March 08, 2023 at 06:18 PM
5 minute read
Analysis
Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals at the Thomas F. Eagleton Courthouse on 111 South 10th Street, St. Louis, MO. Credit: Google The Eighth Circuit has affirmed the grant of a permanent injunction against the enforcement of South Dakota's one-year filing deadlines for submitting petitions to initiate state statutes and to amend the state's constitution, holding that both statutory deadlines violate the First Amendment. But the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's creation of a new, six-month filing deadline and remanded with instructions to modify the injunction accordingly.
The case, SD Voice v. Noem, Nos. 21-3195, 21-3197, ___ F. 4th ___, 2023 WL 2055397 (8th Cir. Feb. 17, 2023), involves South Dakota's regulation of citizens' power to propose changes to state statutes and the state Constitution—specifically, the statutory requirements that signatures in support of a proposed change are only valid if collected during a one-year circulation period that starts two years before, and ends one year before, a general election. See S.D. Codified Laws Sections 2-1-1.1, 2-1-1.2.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them
After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
7 minute read
GOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Pauses Deadline for Federal Workers to Accept Trump Resignation Offer
- 2DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 3'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
- 4Wave of Commercial Real Estate Refinance Could Drown Property Owners
- 5Redeveloping Real Estate After Natural Disasters: Challenges, Strategies and Opportunities
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
