28. How Mid-Market Firms Can Disrupt Big Law
Lean lawyers tend to be progressive lawyers — those who are constantly looking for ways to improve their methods, be more efficient, and looking for trends in the legal industry and the resultant opportunities. These opportunities are where the often overlooked mid-market law firms can disrupt Big Law.
March 17, 2023 at 12:24 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Lean lawyers tend to be progressive lawyers — those who are constantly looking for ways to improve their methods, be more efficient, and looking for trends in the legal industry and the resultant opportunities. These opportunities are where the often overlooked mid-market law firms can disrupt Big Law.
Mid-market firms are more agile than Big Law firms and so better equipped to succeed in a volatile legal market where they can adapt quicker than large firms.
Published metrics suggest that mid-market firms stalled somewhat prior to the pandemic, but then showed an uptick in 2022. But why?
The conventional view is that in times of change clients retreat to the larger firms. But change and volatility aren't the same thing. What we see now in early 2023 is volatility. Inflation is rising, demand is contracting and clients fear a recession. It may not happen, but the fear is enough. All of this can play into the hands of mid-market firms if, but only if, they position themselves correctly.
Sure clients would like the perceived assurance of using the biggest firms, but not at any cost in this economic climate. Existential assignments apart, clients will also consider mid-market firms who can credibly present themselves as more efficient but equally effective problem solvers.
Structured properly, with the right identity and offering, mid-market firms can ride the volatility better than their larger competitors. It's true that they can adapt faster, be more flexible on rates and offer a more attractive platform for talent.
The more progressive mid-size firms can aim to be more than just a threat, they can be disrupters. Consider the effect of some of the other disruptive forces, like ALSPs, tech companies and the Big 4. Each of those disrupters offer teachable takeaways for mid-market firms.
Here's a tip-sheet for mid-market firms in a volatile market:
- Have a clear identity and a good story — clients care about these things.
- Offer flexibility and value without compromising quality.
- Get the attorneys to buy-in — because if they don't the clients won't.
- Find and adopt the right tech and harness it carefully to lawyer talent.
- Make diversity and innovation key parts of solving clients' problems.
- Most of all. don't just say these things on your website, operationalize them.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGroen Strokoff O'Neill, LLC adds accomplished Trial Lawyer, William "Bill" Coppol.
1 minute readCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 2Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 3Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 4Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 5Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250