28. How Mid-Market Firms Can Disrupt Big Law
Lean lawyers tend to be progressive lawyers — those who are constantly looking for ways to improve their methods, be more efficient, and looking for trends in the legal industry and the resultant opportunities. These opportunities are where the often overlooked mid-market law firms can disrupt Big Law.
March 17, 2023 at 12:24 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Lean lawyers tend to be progressive lawyers — those who are constantly looking for ways to improve their methods, be more efficient, and looking for trends in the legal industry and the resultant opportunities. These opportunities are where the often overlooked mid-market law firms can disrupt Big Law.
Mid-market firms are more agile than Big Law firms and so better equipped to succeed in a volatile legal market where they can adapt quicker than large firms.
Published metrics suggest that mid-market firms stalled somewhat prior to the pandemic, but then showed an uptick in 2022. But why?
The conventional view is that in times of change clients retreat to the larger firms. But change and volatility aren't the same thing. What we see now in early 2023 is volatility. Inflation is rising, demand is contracting and clients fear a recession. It may not happen, but the fear is enough. All of this can play into the hands of mid-market firms if, but only if, they position themselves correctly.
Sure clients would like the perceived assurance of using the biggest firms, but not at any cost in this economic climate. Existential assignments apart, clients will also consider mid-market firms who can credibly present themselves as more efficient but equally effective problem solvers.
Structured properly, with the right identity and offering, mid-market firms can ride the volatility better than their larger competitors. It's true that they can adapt faster, be more flexible on rates and offer a more attractive platform for talent.
The more progressive mid-size firms can aim to be more than just a threat, they can be disrupters. Consider the effect of some of the other disruptive forces, like ALSPs, tech companies and the Big 4. Each of those disrupters offer teachable takeaways for mid-market firms.
Here's a tip-sheet for mid-market firms in a volatile market:
- Have a clear identity and a good story — clients care about these things.
- Offer flexibility and value without compromising quality.
- Get the attorneys to buy-in — because if they don't the clients won't.
- Find and adopt the right tech and harness it carefully to lawyer talent.
- Make diversity and innovation key parts of solving clients' problems.
- Most of all. don't just say these things on your website, operationalize them.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLongtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
4 minute readHours After Trump Takes Office, Democratic AGs Target Birthright Citizenship Order
4 minute readHicks Johnson Promotes Lori Arakaki and Daniel Scime to Firm Partnership
2 minute readIAG Forensics & Valuation is excited to announce promotions at our firm effective 1/1/2025.
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 2E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 4FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
- 5Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250