Credit: nito/Adobe Stock Court Sides With Valet Company on Hotel Management Corporation's Indemnification Claims in Trip-and-Fall Case
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit vacated a lower court's order granting summary judgment to a valet company after a hotel management corporation sought indemnification in underlying litigation from a guest's trip and fall on the curb that separates the hotel's valet driveway and its main entrance.
March 28, 2023 at 12:24 PM
7 minute read
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit vacated a lower court's order granting summary judgment to a valet company after a hotel management corporation sought indemnification in underlying litigation from a guest's trip and fall on the curb that separates the hotel's valet driveway and its main entrance.
In a March 2 opinion, the First Circuit vacated the order granting summary judgment to Ultimate Parking, and remanded the case to the U.S. District Court in Rhode Island with instructions to enter judgment for Omni Hotel on its contractual cross-claim for indemnification, following "whatever proceedings the court deems appropriate to determine the amount due to Omni."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Eighth Circuit Determines No Standing for Website User Concerned With Privacy Who Challenged Session-Replay Technology
7 minute read
Divided State Supreme Court Clears the Way for Child Sexual Abuse Cases Against Church, Schools
EMT Qualifies as 'Health Care Provider' Under Whistleblower Act, State Appellate Court Rules
4 minute read
'Lookback Window' Law for Child Abuse Cases Constitutional, State High Court Finds
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 2Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 3Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 4‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
- 5Litera Acquires Workflow Management Provider Peppermint Technology
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
