Law.com Radar Adds State Court Coverage
The expansion includes more than 100 courts in New York, New Jersey, California, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and Texas. More states will be added in the coming weeks and months.
March 30, 2023 at 02:40 PM
2 minute read
In a major expansion, Law.com Radar has added new suit updates from key courts across nine new states, providing visibility into significant litigation arenas that are often challenging to monitor.
The March release includes more than 100 courts in New York, New Jersey, California, Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, Maryland and Texas. Additional state courts will be introduced at a fast pace over the coming weeks and months.
Why it matters: State courts are fragmented, making it complicated for litigators and law firm professionals to discover new cases as soon as they are docketed. Radar's state court expansion employs a team of on-the-ground researchers in order to cover those hard-to-reach venues.
The expansion "provides lawyers with exclusive practice intelligence from hard-to-find sources within the disparate state court systems, while at the same time allowing ALM to provide our readers with more articles on trending litigation topics," said Brian Harris, director of ALM's State Courts Editorial Program.
The new courts build on Law.com Radar's existing coverage of federal district courts and Delaware's Court of Chancery as well as its corporate deal updates and algorithmic Trend Detection capabilities.
Every new suit update from Law.com Radar includes vital information including parties, counsel and case type. Law.com Radar also provides concise summaries of new commercial cases in real time by employing generative technology and editorial review.
Along with the new courts, Law.com Radar now offers daily case report emails by jurisdiction and new suit alerts that can be configured around courts, practice areas, topics, industry segments, law firms, parties or free text searches.
"The new state court content coming into Radar provides readers with a valuable litigation surveillance tool that can help them advise their clients, keep them—and also keep an eye on the competition," said Hank Grezlak, Editor-in-Chief, Regional Brands and Legal Themes. "It also provides us with a springboard to provide deeper news coverage of the most important cases and emerging litigation happening across the U.S."
Law.com Radar is now integrated with My Law.com, bringing together client surveillance with news and analysis based on topics, regions and companies selected by users.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage
Baker Botts' Biopharma Client Sues Former In-House Attorney, Others Alleging Extortion Scheme
Cleary vs. White & Case: NY Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250