Data Mapping: Leave No Data Behind
Why Data Mapping Is a Critical Exercise for Corporate Legal Departments Data mapping is the process of figuring out what information a company gathers, where it is kept and how it moves across the company. This article examines the importance of data mapping for corporate legal departments and how it fits into a larger strategy.
April 18, 2023 at 04:43 PM
15 minute read
This article appeared in Cybersecurity Law & Strategy, an ALM publication for privacy and security professionals, Chief Information Security Officers, Chief Information Officers, Chief Technology Officers, Corporate Counsel, Internet and Tech Practitioners, In-House Counsel. Visit the website to learn more.
In the current digital era, businesses are gathering and keeping enormous volumes of data on their clients, staff and operations. Data breaches and cyberattacks are more likely as data volume increases. Corporate legal departments must implement an efficient information governance procedure that incorporates data mapping to reduce these risks. Data mapping is the process of figuring out what information a company gathers, where it is kept and how it moves across the company. Every company's legal department should engage in it since it enables them to comprehend their data landscape and put the necessary security measures in place to safeguard sensitive data. This article examines the importance of data mapping for corporate legal departments and how it fits into a larger strategy.
|Familiar Ways That Data Mapping Engages In Your Everyday Matters
We all know that data mapping is the process of identifying and documenting the flow of data through a system or organization. In litigation or regulatory cases, data mapping can help identify and locate relevant data sources, understand the scope of data retention obligations and assess the risks associated with data storage and management practices. Here are some familiar ways that data mapping is involved in litigation and regulatory cases:
|- Securities Fraud Investigation. In a securities fraud investigation, data mapping can help identify all the systems and applications that may contain relevant data, such as trading systems, customer databases and email archives. Data mapping can also aid in picking out the individuals with access to this data and the specific elements relevant to the investigation.
- E-Discovery. In e-discovery, data mapping can help identify the locations of electronically stored information and determine the best approach for collecting, processing and reviewing that ESI. This can include mapping the data flow within an organization to find key custodians and data repositories and tracking the data processing and review workflows to ensure that relevant data is identified and produced promptly and efficiently.
- Privacy Compliance. In a privacy compliance audit or investigation, data mapping can help identify the types of personal data that an organization collects, where that data is stored, how it is processed and who has access to it. This can assist organizations in uncovering potential compliance risks and developing strategies for minimizing those risks, such as implementing data minimization and deletion policies.
- Intellectual Property Litigation. In intellectual property litigation, data mapping can help identify the locations of key documents, such as patents, trademarks and copyrights, as well as the systems and applications used to create, store and manage those documents. This can aid in determining potential sources of infringement or misappropriation and potential weaknesses in an organization's intellectual property management practices.
- Anti-Money Laundering Compliance. In an anti-money laundering investigation, data mapping can help identify the locations of financial transaction data, such as bank records and wire transfer logs, as well as the systems and applications used to manage that data. This can allow investigators to trace the flow of funds through an organization and establish potential money laundering activities.
Data mapping has become increasingly important in recent years as more companies collect and process substantial amounts of personal data. Failure to properly map and protect data can lead to legal repercussions, including fines, penalties and legal liability.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Innovation Over Regulation': Tech Litigators and Experts Share Insights on the Future of AI, Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Under Trump
'We're Back': Fourth Circuit Considers Certification of Marriott Data Breach Class ... Again
5 minute readScammers Target Lawyers Across Country With Fake Court Notices
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
- 2People and Purpose: AbbVie's GC on Leading With Impact and Inspiring Change
- 3Beef Between Two South Florida Law Firms Deepens With Suit Over Defamation
- 4Judge Skips Over Sanctions in Talc Bankruptcy: 'That’s A No'
- 5Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250