Examining the 2023 Am Law 100: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
April 19, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
TURBULENT '22 - Inflation. Recession. War. Interest rate hikes. Suffice to say law firms played 2022 on "hard mode." Still, as Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, for many firms, especially those that saw just slight declines in revenue, 2022 was their second-best year ever, after 2021. Sounds crazy, right? But the newly released 2023 Am Law 100 data bears that out. Of course, a number of other firms that reached milestones in fiscal 2021 took a step back in 2022. Wachtell, LIpton Rosen & Katz, for example, became the firm to cross the $8 million mark in PEP in FY2021. The firm walked that back in 2022, however. Davis, Polk & Wardwell and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, meanwhile, both crossed the $7 million mark in PEP in FY2021. Now both sit at under $6 million after dropping 20.83% and 7.09%, respectively.
VALUE AD? - Do personal injury lawyer advertisements lead to bigger recoveries for plaintiffs? As Law.com's Charles Toutant reports, the defense bar and insurance companies think so. They use the term "social inflation" to describe a pattern of longer trials and larger verdicts and settlements that are not supported by a legal or factual basis. Robert Tyson, a defense attorney at Tyson & Mendes in San Diego, said he believes ads touting plaintiffs firms' major recoveries serve to desensitize potential jurors to the idea of awarding large sums. A lawyer who obtains a hefty recovery is "able to advertise it as plaintiffs lawyers, in order for it to get published in newspaper articles and for the general public who sits on the jury to get numb to it, right? Like, what's the value of a life now? $10 million? You don't blink at that anymore," Tyson said.
ON THE RADAR - Certain executives and board members at biotechnology company Novavax Inc. were hit with a shareholder derivative lawsuit April 17 in Maryland Circuit Court for Montgomery County. According to the complaint, Novavax received a flush of public funding in 2020 to develop a COVID-19 vaccine, causing share prices to leap from $4 in early 2020 to $104 in July of the same year. The complaint accuses the defendants of concealing problems with vaccine production and compliance that ultimately lost the company its opportunity to market its COVID-19 vaccine. The lawsuit further alleges that the defendants unloaded $87 million in Novavax shares while keeping shareholders in the dark. Zuckerman Spaeder and Morris Kandinov LLP filed the lawsuit on behalf of Jared Needelman, a Novavax shareholder. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is C-15-CV-23-001550, Needelman v. Erck. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
Skadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readAmex Latest Target as Regulators Scrutinize Whether Credit Card Issuers Deliver on Rewards Promises
The Law Firm Disrupted: Tech Investment Is Necessary Yet Expensive. The Big Four Have a Leg Up
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250