Associate Class Year Adjustments Underscore Lingering Skills Gap: The Morning Minute
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up. WHAT WE'RE WATCHING WHAT'S MY YEAR AGAIN? - As the legal industry adjusts…
April 27, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
WHAT'S MY YEAR AGAIN? - As the legal industry adjusts to an employer-driven market for talent, several legal recruiters in California and New York told Law.com's Jessie Yount they've seen an abnormal number of associates being asked to take a class year reduction or being informed they won't advance with the rest of their class in recent months. One recruiter, who asked to speak anonymously, recalled that candidates had an enormous amount of bargaining power during the pandemic and many avoided taking a class year reduction. Now, however, "people in that type of situation have been impacted by reductions or are being put on a performance plan and potentially being papered for a future reduction," the recruiter said. The trend reflects a bigger problem, as firms struggle to rightsize their talent pools and appropriately assess skill levels.
CONSUMER INTELLIGENCE - Relationships between legal technology providers and law firms have often been put to the test due to rising prices, oversold capabilities or integration headaches. And more recently, there's been an influx of announcements from legal tech vendors integrating generative AI into the latest version of their tools, or coming out with new generative AI-powered offerings. So how do firms shut off the hype machine when shopping for machine learning capabilities? "We treat it very much akin to any other emerging technology and we apply a great dose of what I call innovation discipline," Katherine Lowry, chief information officer at BakerHostetler, told Law.com's Cassandre Coyer. "That's really kind of bringing structure to the process so that we are evaluating technology, both the benefits and the risks."
ON THE RADAR - Lawyers at Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders on Wednesday removed a civil RICO lawsuit against fintech company Braviant's subsidiary SunUp Financial, Total Loan Services and Capital Community Bank to Florida Middle District Court. The suit accuses the defendants of engaging in a 'rent-a-bank' scheme whereby loan originator CCB would assign loans to SunUp in Utah in order to bypass Florida's usury statutes. According to the complaint, Braviant's CEO Matt Martorello engaged in a similar 'rent-a-tribe' scheme involving Big Picture Loans, resulting in an $8.7 million class action settlement. The complaint was filed by Seraph Legal on behalf of Rupert Perry. The case is 3:23-cv-00485, Perry v. SunUp Financial LLC et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
'A Warning Shot to Board Rooms': DOJ Decision to Fight $14B Tech Merger May Be Bad Omen for Industry
'Incredibly Complicated'? Antitrust Litigators Identify Pros and Cons of Proposed One Agency Act
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250