Diversity Improving at Law Firms Despite Headwinds: The Morning Minute
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up. WHAT WE'RE WATCHING DIVERSITY SCORECARD - If you're someone who generally…
June 01, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
DIVERSITY SCORECARD - If you're someone who generally values advancing diversity in the legal profession until the national lawyer population mirrors its U.S. population, you'll find good news and bad news in the American Lawyer's 2023 Diversity Scorecard, Law.com's Dan Roe reports. The good news is that the nation's law firms are becoming more diverse, according to a survey of more than 200 law firms that asked firms to disclose race and ethnicity in hiring, retention, promotion and departure metrics along with the diversity of leadership. The bad news is these gains still leave Big Law behind the minority totals across the full profession.
DOWN ON THE UPSIDE - Am Law 200 firms, from the elite crowd to more regional shops, have grown their attorney head count, despite slower demand and productivity declines since 2021. More people + less work would seem to be an equation that's less than ideal, so what gives? As Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, some of that head count growth is likely inadvertent, as the attrition rate slows, while some law firms are also planning longer-term investments to build scale, with specific practice area and geographic growth needs, say firm leaders and analysts. "I think it's that they see their strength and they're recruiting for areas that do have growth, and they just haven't reduced in areas they haven't seen growth. It's not a decision overall to say, 'We wanna continue to grow head count,'" said Owen Burman, managing director for Wells Fargo Legal Group, on the overall growth in head count recently.
ON THE RADAR - Pierce Atwood and the Institute for Free Speech filed a civil rights lawsuit Tuesday in Maine District Court on behalf of Dinner Table PAC, Fight For Freedom PAC and other plaintiffs. The suit targets members of the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices over the state's contribution limit on state legislators regarding political action committees (PACs). According to the complaint, as of Jan. 1, 2023, only four state legislators are permitted to raise unlimited dollars, including the Speaker of the House, the President of the Senate and the minority leaders. The complaint contends that the limit violates the First Amendment freedoms of speech and association and seeks to declare the law unconstitutional. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:23-cv-00221, Libby et al v. Schneider et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMany Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute readLife Sciences M&A Set to Boom, Litigation to Remain Steady Under New Trump Admin
5 minute read'Innovation Over Regulation': Tech Litigators and Experts Share Insights on the Future of AI, Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Under Trump
Inside Track: How 2 Big Financial Stories—an Antitrust Case and a Megamerger—Became Intertwined
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright', Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
- 2Environmental Law in Trump’s Second Term
- 3Lock-Maker's Veteran GC Takes Old Job Back After Successor Lasts Just 3 Months
- 4Judge Sets April Retrial Date in Sarah Palin Defamation Action Against NY Times
- 5HSF and Kramer Levin Leaders Set Out Merger Timeline, Structure
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250