Litigation Costs Increases: Why Legal and Claims Leaders Need Tech to Reduce Risk
With claims litigation costs increasing, GCs and claims executives need better technology and insights to reduce their organization's risk.
August 09, 2023 at 10:40 AM
4 minute read
With claims litigation and legal spend surging, claims executives are under pressure to control costs and reduce risk. Take commercial auto insurers' liability, for example. Liability losses almost tripled in the past decade, and median jury verdict monetary awards nearly doubled, the Insurance Information Institute finds.
The Insurance Research Council (IRC) also reports that the average insurer payment per insured vehicle grew 31 percent for bodily injury claims and 26 percent for personal injury protection no-fault claims during a nine-year period. Another IRC survey underscores significant increases in large medical malpractice verdicts.
The reasons for these increases are varied — from changes in jurors' perspectives to enactment of more plaintiff-friendly statutes to a boost in large nuclear verdicts
What claim executives need is technology that can analyze data and allow organizations to understand their costs while finding ways to reduce risks that can affect the bottom line.
Control 'more important than ever'
Numerous recent factors are leading to increases in claims volume, including inflation, economic pressures and the trend toward bigger verdicts, says Jenny Snyder, claims litigation manager at Ohio Mutual Insurance Group.
"It's more important than ever for us to mitigate our risks and control costs," she adds. "We need to continue to focus on and counteract this trend."
These trends started to emerge before COVID-19, but post-pandemic losses continue to escalate, Snyder says.
Ohio Mutual relies on technology and data analytics to hone in on opportunities where the company can manage litigation expenses and find the most effective law firm, she adds, a view shared by many GCs. The carrier uses the legal platform Assure Legal Insights from DXC, a company with broad experience guiding the insurance industry on claims and related cost management.
The DXC Assure Legal Insights platform provides access to litigation outcomes, judicial analytics and legal spend benchmarking. This all-in-one tool includes data from U.S. federal courts and almost all state and local courts allowing users to learn how a particular judge ruled in similar matters, how attorneys fared before that judge and how long it took to resolve a particular matter.
A way to sharpen strategy
Snyder and her team use DXC Assure Legal Insights to review billing practices, billing cycles and the company's budgets. Those reviews allow Ohio Mutual to look at average case duration and outcomes, which helps reduce costs. Average verdicts in a given venue also help refine strategy.
And by identifying and partnering with defense counsel, the carrier determines the best approach to protect its insureds, manage risks and allow for a fair claim resolution.
Snyder says as data analytics become more relied on, users get a "holistic perspective with how loss control, product data and claims data all interact." By using these tools, she continues, Ohio Mutual is afforded "a high-level overview of our results" that is easily accessible and digestible, rather than having multiple reports that take time.
Previously, she says, it was harder to see trends in particular venues or with certain counsel.
The most effective way carriers can keep litigation costs down, Snyder advises, is to stop unnecessary litigation before it starts. This is done by properly investigating, evaluating and settling claims in a timely and accurate fashion. Some claims, however, are not able to be resolved without litigation and with those claims, carriers must be proactive in their discussions with counsel, she says.
Only DXC Assure Legal Insights leverages cross-dataset analysis to combine cost benchmarking and court data in a single interface, enabling legal and claims teams to accurately analyze both matter outcomes and cost, as well as how they interact. To learn more, visit DXC Legal Solutions.
Pamela Brownstein is a freelance writer covering legal issues and the business of law.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPlaintiffs Seek Redo of First Trial Over Medical Device Plant's Emissions
4 minute readMiami Beach Hotel Sues Celebrity Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, Asserts It Won’t Be ‘Extorted'
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 2Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 3Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 4Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 5Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250