Litigation Costs Increases: Why Legal and Claims Leaders Need Tech to Reduce Risk
With claims litigation costs increasing, GCs and claims executives need better technology and insights to reduce their organization's risk.
August 09, 2023 at 10:40 AM
4 minute read
With claims litigation and legal spend surging, claims executives are under pressure to control costs and reduce risk. Take commercial auto insurers' liability, for example. Liability losses almost tripled in the past decade, and median jury verdict monetary awards nearly doubled, the Insurance Information Institute finds.
The Insurance Research Council (IRC) also reports that the average insurer payment per insured vehicle grew 31 percent for bodily injury claims and 26 percent for personal injury protection no-fault claims during a nine-year period. Another IRC survey underscores significant increases in large medical malpractice verdicts.
The reasons for these increases are varied — from changes in jurors' perspectives to enactment of more plaintiff-friendly statutes to a boost in large nuclear verdicts
What claim executives need is technology that can analyze data and allow organizations to understand their costs while finding ways to reduce risks that can affect the bottom line.
Control 'more important than ever'
Numerous recent factors are leading to increases in claims volume, including inflation, economic pressures and the trend toward bigger verdicts, says Jenny Snyder, claims litigation manager at Ohio Mutual Insurance Group.
"It's more important than ever for us to mitigate our risks and control costs," she adds. "We need to continue to focus on and counteract this trend."
These trends started to emerge before COVID-19, but post-pandemic losses continue to escalate, Snyder says.
Ohio Mutual relies on technology and data analytics to hone in on opportunities where the company can manage litigation expenses and find the most effective law firm, she adds, a view shared by many GCs. The carrier uses the legal platform Assure Legal Insights from DXC, a company with broad experience guiding the insurance industry on claims and related cost management.
The DXC Assure Legal Insights platform provides access to litigation outcomes, judicial analytics and legal spend benchmarking. This all-in-one tool includes data from U.S. federal courts and almost all state and local courts allowing users to learn how a particular judge ruled in similar matters, how attorneys fared before that judge and how long it took to resolve a particular matter.
A way to sharpen strategy
Snyder and her team use DXC Assure Legal Insights to review billing practices, billing cycles and the company's budgets. Those reviews allow Ohio Mutual to look at average case duration and outcomes, which helps reduce costs. Average verdicts in a given venue also help refine strategy.
And by identifying and partnering with defense counsel, the carrier determines the best approach to protect its insureds, manage risks and allow for a fair claim resolution.
Snyder says as data analytics become more relied on, users get a "holistic perspective with how loss control, product data and claims data all interact." By using these tools, she continues, Ohio Mutual is afforded "a high-level overview of our results" that is easily accessible and digestible, rather than having multiple reports that take time.
Previously, she says, it was harder to see trends in particular venues or with certain counsel.
The most effective way carriers can keep litigation costs down, Snyder advises, is to stop unnecessary litigation before it starts. This is done by properly investigating, evaluating and settling claims in a timely and accurate fashion. Some claims, however, are not able to be resolved without litigation and with those claims, carriers must be proactive in their discussions with counsel, she says.
Only DXC Assure Legal Insights leverages cross-dataset analysis to combine cost benchmarking and court data in a single interface, enabling legal and claims teams to accurately analyze both matter outcomes and cost, as well as how they interact. To learn more, visit DXC Legal Solutions.
Pamela Brownstein is a freelance writer covering legal issues and the business of law.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250