How Remote Flexibility Helps This Firm Land Lateral Talent: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 23, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Law Firm Hiring
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
EVERYONE EVERYWHERE - Last week in this space, we told you about how the pitch for fully remote lateral hires has become more difficult as overall demand has decreased. But, in a competitive lateral market for patent litigation associates, Fish & Richardson is using remote flexibility to land talent in regions far away from a firm office, Law.com's Dan Roe reports. And, thanks to a backlog in trials and market uncertainty driving disputes, demand is booming for Fish & Richardson's patent litigation practice, said Corrin Drakulich, global head of litigation. Already, the firm has hired nine lateral associates this year, and it plans to hire another nine by the end of the year. "We still try to meet the needs of an office, for example, if they need additional bodies to help out, but we don't want to miss out on a great candidate with a great tech background who is a strong cultural fit just because they don't live near an office," Drakulich said. "We have made hires where someone doesn't live near a Fish & Richardson office, and we find other ways to connect."
SCOTUS-BOUND? - The U.S. Supreme Court's 2022-2023 term wrapped up in June with major rulings on affirmative action, student debt relief and voting rights. But what other legal issues percolating in the lower courts might elicit high court review? From tort claims against the federal government to bankruptcy protections to transgender health care, Law.com's Avalon Zoppo examines some of the questions dividing judges on the federal appeals courts.
ON THE RADAR - O'Reilly Automotive was sued by the State of Washington over alleged pregnancy-based employment discrimination on Aug. 16 in Washington Superior Court for King County. The court action claims that O'Reilly has a practice of refusing requests for reasonable accommodations from pregnant employees, including flexible restroom breaks, weight lifting restrictions to 17 pounds or less and the ability to sit. The complaint contends that the policy of denying accommodations has resulted in the constructive discharge of pregnant employees. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 23-2-15318-9 SEA, State Of Washington v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
'Sharp and Profound' Policy Shifts Prompt DC Law Firms to Evaluate Opportunities, Challenges
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
