Law Firms' Real Estate and Tech Spending Are Now Intertwined: The Morning Minute
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up. WHAT WE'RE WATCHING INEXTRICABLE EXPENSES - Do law firms have the resources…
September 12, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
INEXTRICABLE EXPENSES - Do law firms have the resources to pay for the technological innovations they feel they need to compete, while also having the kind of office space that encourages attendance (despite the technology that makes it unnecessary for some)? Maybe. As, Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, the idea that real estate and technology spending are inversely related is not necessarily correct. In fact, it's becoming increasingly clear that the two line items—which trail only talent on the overall cost hierarchy—have a more complex relationship. Essentially, firms' success in linking the two will determine how vibrant their workplaces are going forward.
CASES OR CONTROVERSIES? - Alternative facts, fake news, virtual reality, artificial intelligence—in an era when "truth" is in the eye of the beholder, it's only fitting that SCOTUS has come under fire from critics who say the justices are deciding sweeping legal issues based on questionable factual assertions, or as some put it, "fake cases." Cornell Law School Professor Michael C. Dorf told Law.com's Jimmy Hoover that this trend is partially fueled by a supermajority of GOP appointees who have shown an interest in advancing the law in a conservative direction. However, Dorf also noted that this is neither a brand new phenomenon nor one limited to the ideological right. "All of the justices are willing to manufacture standing where they want it," Dorf said. "It's just that right now, it's the conservatives who have the majority."
ON THE RADAR - Aretec Group Inc., doing business as Cetera Holdings, has agreed to acquire tax-focused financial planning and wealth management firm Avantax Inc. for a total enterprise value of approximately $1.2 billion. The transaction, announced Sept. 11, is expected to close by the end of 2023. Aretec was advised by a Willkie Farr & Gallagher team led by partners Manuel Miranda, Jeffrey Poss and Thomas Sharkey. Avantax Inc., which is based in Coppell, Texas, was represented by Sidley Austin and Haynes and Boone. The Haynes and Boone team was led by partner Dan Malone. A Latham & Watkins team led by partner Robert Katz counseled PJT Partners, acting as financial advisor to Avantax. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
- 2Biden commutes sentences for 37 of 40 federal death row inmates, including two convicted of California murders
- 3Avoiding Franchisor Failures: Be Cautious and Do Your Research
- 4De-Mystifying the Ethics of the Attorney Transition Process, Part 1
- 5Alex Spiro Accuses Prosecutors of 'Unethical' Comments in Adams' Bribery Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250