People, Places & Profits, Part II: A Look at the Geographic Destinations of the Am Law 200
Law firm growth is concentrated in a few areas around the country. Here we look at which cities are seeing the most interest from new entrants and how that is shaking up the markets in those regions.
October 04, 2023 at 10:44 AM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com Pro
In part one of our three-part series looking back on 2022's "People, Places, & Profit," we examined partner hires, the continued leverage model shift, and debuted the Professional Staff per Lawyer (PSPL) metric. In part two, we're looking deeper into the domestic markets where Am Law 200 and NLJ 350 law firms are opening offices.
As mentioned in part one, New York and Washington, D.C., were the most active markets for Am Law 200 partner hires in 2022, which will be the case in most years. But even as law firms continue wrestling with back-to-office policies and initiatives, it didn't stop expansion into new markets. Houston edged Miami for the most office openings, although if you consider Miami & Fort Lauderdale as one broader market, southeast Florida wins top honors.
The list of markets with the most NLJ 350 openings in 2022 includes the names many would expect to see–Houston, Miami, Washington, D.C., Chicago, Los Angeles, etc. But two markets near the top of the list stand out–Charlotte and San Diego. Over the past 10 years, the number of NLJ 350 firms with Charlotte offices increased by 77%, the tenth-most amongst the 44 largest domestic markets. San Diego's five new office openings in 2022 doubled California's southern-most legal market's total for the previous nine years combined. San Diego is a market similar to North Carolina's Raleigh-Durham Research Triangle, a secondary legal market with strong ties to innovation and biotech but with additional strengths in national defense, aerospace, and maritime. Like Raleigh Durham, San Diego has ranked anywhere from the top 5 to the top 10 in various publications' rankings of the best markets for life sciences. Boston and San Francisco remain the top U.S. markets for life sciences and biotech, and in addition to San Diego and Raleigh-Durham, Philadelphia, Orange County, and Minneapolis are strong life sciences markets.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPeople, Places & Profits, Part I: A Look at the Talent Decisions Across the Full Am Law 200
8 minute readFirst-Mover Advantage: Where Firms Are Still Getting Value For Their Lateral Expansion Dollars
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250