Firms Face Tough Questions About Single-Tier Partnerships: The Morning Minute
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up. WHAT WE'RE WATCHING TIERS FOR FEARS - As profits have grown, the U.S.'s…
November 02, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
TIERS FOR FEARS - As profits have grown, the U.S.'s highest-earning law firms have begun worrying whether a single equity tier of partners can sustain such wide disparities in financial contribution. As Law.com's Justin Henry reports, that has their leaders now weighing the pros and cons of adopting a nonequity tier. Even Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, which has long maintained a single-tier partnership, is considering a non-equity tier as early as 2024 in an effort to keeps its counsel-level attorneys from moving to competitors. "It is signaling further departure from single-tier lockstep that has traditionally been in place with many Wall Street firms," said recruiter Dan Binstock, a partner with search firm Garrison. "The more those profits rise, it gets harder for partners in certain practice areas to have practices at that size."
DWINDLING SUPPORT? - Earlier this year, partners said a lack of associate support to build their practice was the third most likely reason they'd leave a firm, just behind a lack of confidence in a firm's management or strategy and compensation, according to the 2023 Lateral Partner Satisfaction Survey from Major, Lindsey & Africa. At the same time, the top reason partners said they chose their new firm was its perceived ability to support and elevate their practice. Those concerns clearly aren't new, and yet, as Law.com's Jessie Yount reports, more recent observations from legal recruiters reveal that the number of partners falling into that third bucket may be growing as firms struggle to provide partners with adequate associate support.
ON THE RADAR - Ocean Spray Cranberries was named in a consumer class action Oct. 31 in California Northern District Court over the labeling of its cranberry juice as containing no preservatives. The suit, filed by Crosner Legal, alleges that the label of 'no preservatives' is fraudulent as the juice contains citric acid. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 4:23-cv-05627, Wright v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSullivan & Cromwell Signals 5-Day RTO Expectation as Law Firms Remain Split on Optimal Attendance
How Dana Rao Built a 'Yes' Culture at Adobe and Why He Walked Away
Former UPS Workers Lodge Discrimination Suit for 'Systemic Racial Bias' in Workplace Culture
11th Circuit Rejects Former CSX Employee's Safety-Related Whistleblowing Claims
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250