Legal Playbook: Integrating Generative AI Responsibly Into In-house Teams
Explore how GAI can streamline researching, drafting, summarizing and analyzing legal work for your in-house team.
November 17, 2023 at 02:14 PM
2 minute read
[ON-DEMAND ONLY]
This event is now available on-demand. If you have previously registered for this event please login here using the email that you used to register.
Cost: Complimentary
Sponsored by:
Generative AI (GAI) poses both risks and benefits for in-house legal teams, though it is appropriate to embrace rather than fear its potential. Yet GAI necessitates lawyers' comprehension of input, confidence in the generated output, scrutiny of operational risks, and management of external risks posed by evolving legal scenarios.
This discussion will delve into the ethical and practical aspects that in-house legal departments must address before integrating Generative AI into their workflows. This includes exploring security considerations to prepare for the widespread adoption of GAI tools within your legal practice.
Join this webcast and walk through the steps legal departments need to consider and complete for GAI to meet its full potential. Explore how GAI can streamline researching, drafting, summarizing and analyzing legal work for your in-house team.
You'll learn:
- Steps to maximize GAI's potential
- Use cases for how GAI can help with daily tasks
- Risks that GAI presents for in-house legal teams
- How in-house counsel can mitigate these risks
Speaker:
 | Jen Stringfield, Esq. | Subject Matter Advisor, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, Data Security & Privacy | LexisNexis Jen Stringfield, Esq., Subject Matter Advisor, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, Data Security & Privacy Jen is a seasoned legal professional with a deep understanding of legal technology as it relates to the practice of law. She is a subject matter expert in Intellectual Property and Data Security & Privacy at LexisNexis. Over her extensive tenure at Lexis, exceeding a decade, Jen has emerged as a key player in the intersection of law and technology. She possesses a wealth of experience in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications within the legal landscape, contributing to advancements in legal tech and the integration of AI into legal practice. Before her tenure at LexisNexis, Jen practiced as a litigation attorney in the Chicago. Jen holds a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Illinois at Chicago and a Juris Doctor from Chicago-Kent College of Law. |
Can't attend? You should still register! We will send out an on-demand recording after the webcast so you can participate when it's convenient for you.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Beyond the finish line: Why the real race begins with CLM Post-Implementation Support
4 minute read
Emerging Technologies and Best Practices for Data Governance in Law Firms
2 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Construction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
- 2Phila. Jury Hits Sig Sauer With $11M Verdict Over Alleged Gun Defect
- 3Lost in the Legal Maze: How State Regulations Are Hindering Hemp Operators' Success
- 4New Associates Yearbook 2024
- 5Disbarred Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Lawsuit Against Miami-Dade Judges
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
