Litigators Juggle 'Grueling' Post-Pandemic Trial Schedules: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
November 20, 2023 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
TRYING TO KEEP UP - Talk to most litigators and they'll tell you they're thrilled to be back in the swing of regularly trying cases after an agonizing few years in a state of pandemic-induced stasis. But what trial lawyers in Philadelphia are experiencing at the moment is indicative of just how tough it can be to get caught up after reopening the valve on the case pipeline. As Law.com's Aleeza Furman reports, the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas' push to clear backlogged cases has meant crammed schedules for lawyers, with some attorneys saying they're booked for back-to-back or even overlapping trial dates through 2024. "We're trying to take the soonest trial dates as soon as we get them and worry about how to cover it when we get there," Joseph Messa Jr., founder of personal injury firm Messa & Associates, said, estimating he has an average of five trials a month booked through the summer of 2024—a pace he said started approximately eight months ago.
LAYOFFS STAVED OFF? - Billing rate increases continue to cause agita for clients (and partners in certain practice areas), but it turns out they could also be saving jobs as we head into 2024. During a period of relatively flat demand, rate hikes continue to drive Big Law revenue, as law firms on average rose rates by 7.9% by Q3, the highest mark since at least the Great Recession period. That's according to a nine-month survey by Wells Fargo's Legal Specialty Group, which echoed other recent findings that a healthy 2023 will depend "more than usual on a successful year-end collections push," but added that billing rates and revenue gains have arguably helped firms stave off more cuts next year and emboldened leaders to keep their foot on the accelerator when it comes to rates. "I don't think the term 'layoff' will come into play," Owen Burman, senior consultant and managing director with the Wells Fargo Legal Specialty Group, told Law.com's Andrew Maloney.
ON THE RADAR - John Goldmark and MaryAnn T. Almeida of Davis Wright Tremaine have stepped in to defend Amazon.com in a pending antitrust class action. The action, filed Oct. 3 in Washington Western District Court by Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, alleges that Amazon has coerced and induced its third party sellers and wholesale suppliers to enter into anti-competitive agreements on price and has improperly bundled its services, resulting in higher, unavoidable fee. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge John H. Chun, is 2:23-cv-01523, Hopper v. Amazon.com Inc et al. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Kelly Hart Secures $27M Trade Secrets Misappropriation Final Judgment in Fort Worth Trial
3 minute read
Miami Beach Hotel Sues Celebrity Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, Asserts It Won’t Be ‘Extorted'
4 minute read
‘Badge of Honor’: SEC Targets CyberKongz in Token Registration Dispute
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
