Law Firms' Profit Growth Hinge on Data-Backed Financial Hygiene
Facing demand and tighter margins, 65% of law firms are ready to focus on financial hygiene – which requires a tech- and data-driven approach.
November 30, 2023 at 11:44 AM
4 minute read
Law firms and legal leaders need to move beyond traditionalism if they want to continue and expand profit growth, a recent survey by BigHand and LawVision finds – with 40% of firms reporting flat or negative profit growth and 62% noting the need to conduct profitability education and training.
In a survey of major legal jurisdictions across the U.S., Canada, the UK and the EU, law firm leaders largely report that they are beginning to recognize that there is much room for improvement when it comes to profitability.
On the one hand, over 80% of law firms report that they are trending either on plan or above plan for profitability in 2023. Far fewer, however, are satisfied with their recent profitability compared to last year. Only 63% of firms reported any level of satisfaction with recent profitability – representing a 24-point drop from last year's 87%. The percentage of firms reporting outright dissatisfaction more than quadrupled – from about 5% last year to more than 20% this year.
Addressing Law Firm Profitability
This dissonance comes from the combination of tough economic times and law firms' need for greater financial sophistication, says Rod Wittenberg, Vice President of Financial-Productivity Solutions at BigHand.
"There is a decline in profitability," Wittenberg says. "Law firms are working with more staff to do the work, so hours per lawyer are down."
Firms are more used to tracking revenue as a proxy for profitability, Wittenberg adds. While revenue continues to tick upward – for several reasons, including that firms have raised rates by several percentage points – the lack of substantial profit growth presents a scalability issue that needs to be addressed with firm-wide upleveling of financial acumen.
Building Profit Sophistication
Most firms seem to be coming around to this way of thinking. While the billable hour remains law firms' top profitability-performance metric, the second-most identified profitability priority in the survey was financial hygiene – with 65% identifying improving financial hygiene as a significant project they intend to address.
This second priority represents the right one, Wittenberg explains.
"The inclination, when you see profit declining or flat, is to cut costs or increase prices – but improving your financial hygiene can enable you to make changes without either of those things," Wittenberg says. "Quick wins won't yield sustainable growth."
Law firm leaders are increasing staffing; accordingly, the survey shows a large spike in the number of firms adding pricing (47%) and finance roles (41%).
Data-Driven Profitability
Wittenberg finds this rise in law firms of matter-pricing and project-management professionals heartening. Still, there is still more to be done – and that work must be buttressed by data.
As lawyers must research a client matter, they also must research business optimization to keep the firm on strong financial footing. Law firms are also tapping into technologies, such as legal business intelligence ("BI") platforms that provide additional visibility into financial data. In turn, BI can help with initiatives ranging from talent acquisition to business development strategies.
Fortunately, as law firms strive to increase profitability, legal leaders are realizing that good financial hygiene is key to growth – and that profitability-educated lawyers equipped with the right tech investments are helping to lead the way. In this year's survey, more than half of firms reported using a major legal-industry BI platform for profitability visualization.
"There has been an incredible move over the past two to three years to educate lawyers on being better collaborators with their clients and internally to drive matter and client profitability," Wittenberg says. "But financial metrics underpin all of it; if you have access to financial metrics, you can see your rates, you can give better visibility to your clients, and you can price better."
Joe Stanganelli is a writer and recovering attorney. He is managing director of content advisory Blackwood King LC.
To find out more or access the full BigHand report, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
What About the Old Partners Who Have No Interest in AI?
Avantia CEO Discusses Blurring Lines Between Law Firm, Software Provider and ALSP
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 2'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 3Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 4The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
- 5Trump 2.0 and Your Career
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250