Will the Law Firm Merger Party Continue in 2024?: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 02, 2024 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Law Firm Mergers
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
MORE MERGERS MAYBE? - Happy New Year! Big Law kicked off 2023 by scooping up a ton of smaller boutiques, and merger discussions and interest generally perked up as the year went along. So will the pace continue in 2024? Legal industry observers told Law.com's Andrew Maloney that laterals and promotions will likely be the main way firms try to grow next year. But even assuming a down market—or perhaps because of it—the pace of law firm merger activity may continue next year, particularly among smaller and regional firms. Predicting the pace of law firm consolidation is always a challenge, noted Lisa Smith, a principal at Fairfax Associates, "[b]ut I think we'll see more of the same, which is the continued interest in combinations, but limited by the continued challenge of being able to get them done."
PARTNER POLARITY - Another thing that isn't likely to change this year? The fact that being a top rainmaker at a top firm is a pretty good gig if you can get it. At the highest end of the pay scale for partners at the richest law firms in the world sit a select few taking home $25 million or more in annual salary, an indication of the flexibility some firms have in rewarding high levels of performance, Law.com's Justin Henry reports. By growing the pay ratio among the highest and lowest-paid partners, firms have sought to compete for rainmaking talent while making room for practitioners who don't measure up to higher thresholds for equity partnership, according to law firm consultants and leaders. This tension has been accentuated since 2021, as financial disparities between various practices have become more pronounced.
ON THE RADAR - Powermers Smart Industries Inc., a green-powered technology solutions and product platform company, is going public via SPAC merger with OCA Acquisition Corp. As a result of the merger, Powermers will be listed on the Nasdaq with a post-transaction equity value of approximately $2 billion. Powermers, which is based in New York, is represented by Paul Hastings; Graubard Miller; and PAG Law. The SPAC was advised by Kirkland & Ellis and Han Kun Law Offices. The Kirkland team was led by capital markets partners Christian Nagler and Anthony Zangrillo. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
