Legal Departments Face Blizzard of Worker-Friendly Laws: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 03, 2024 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION YEAR - Here's some good news for all those in-house lawyers who were hoping this year would bring them even more work: as Law.com's Chris O'Malley reports, legal departments will grapple with a heavy load of new employment laws taking effect in 2024, particularly in worker-friendly states like California, Illinois and New York. For instance, several states and cities are rolling out new laws forcing employers to boost pay and to grant employees additional leave. California, meanwhile, is cracking down hard on noncompete provisions. While the state already generally bans such postemployment restrictions, it may now impose civil penalties against employers that try to secure and enforce these agreements.
APPEALING ARRAY - The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a slew of high-profile cases this year, from a major challenge to administrative agencies' power to the scope of the obstruction charge applied in Jan. 6 prosecutions. SCOTUS-heads are understandably hyped, but don't sleep on the federal appellate courts, who have some doozies on their dockets for 2024 too. As Law.com's Avalon Zoppo reports, circuit courts across the country will be tackling an eclectic array of issues including venue tests in false statements prosecutions, the Inflation Reduction Act's drug pricing negotiation program, the "actual malice" standard for bringing defamation claims and the EPA's nationwide plan for curbing the interstate travel of ozone pollution.
ON THE RADAR - Robin S. Weiss and Charles E. Murphy of Clark Hill have stepped in to represent Marvele, Jigar Patel and other defendants in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Nov. 17 in Florida Southern District Court by Greenberg Traurig on behalf of 2 3 Suited, accuses Patel of fraudulently inducing the plaintiff to purchase shares of Devi Holdings Inc. stock by deliberately concealing $13 million of undisclosed tax liability owed by Devi and making false and misleading statements regarding Devi's tax liability and overall financial condition. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks, is 9:23-cv-81503, 2 3 Suited, LLC v. Patel et al. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read
‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute read
Conservative Boutiques That Backed Trump Reap Their Rewards
What Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How I Made Partner: 'Develop a Practice Area You Really Care About ,' Says Jennifer Gniady of Stradley Ronon
- 2Indian Billionaire Gautam Adani Indicted in Brooklyn for Alleged Orchestration of $250 Million Bribery Plot
- 3Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
- 4GC Conference Takeaways: Picking AI Vendors 'a Bit of a Crap Shoot,' Beware of Internal Investigation 'Scope Creep'
- 5Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
