25. Transitioning from Student to Associate: Raise Bills or Raise Eyebrows
It's not just how smart you are, how much you know, or even how hard you work. It's how you work. Methods matter. If you can learn to practice law the way that work-givers want, you'll become their go-to resource.
January 05, 2024 at 10:54 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
At Lean Adviser we try to look at the overlooked. These are the topics and challenges which everyone encounters, but no-one discusses. We start with a doozy — transitioning. We previously trailed this when we touched on the big "transitioning moments" in our lives. It's not just that the skills gap can be enormous, it's that it's unexpected.
This is the first lesson in a mini-series on these transitions, and how lawyers can be unsupported, so here goes. We'll start with transitioning from student to associate. Then we'll look at associate to partner, and then transitioning from private practice to in-house and vice versa.
You probably thought that after the rigors of law school, and the tortuous process of getting a job, that the hard part was over. Then you discovered, as we all did, that you were under-prepared and ill-equipped. As we explain in Lean Adviser, law schools teach you what the law is, not how to practice it.
So here you are, thrown into a tank with other talented, competitive, newly-minted associates. Then comes the work, for which you'll be charged out at hundreds of dollars an hour. Either that or swaths of your time will be written off. Raise bills or raise eyebrows. Welcome to private practice.
The industry solution for the skills gap is on-the-job mentoring. But this is where it gets patchy. Done right, an alliance between a great mentor and a quick-study associate can deliver a crash course in how to practice law the way clients want. Done wrong, the associate will have to make do with trial and error, all the while being marginalized and falling down the pecking order for interesting assignments.
This is precisely the educational gap which Lean Law exists to meet. For all of your hopefully long career, workflow will be your lifeblood. Initially, the work will come from partners who regard you as their go-to associate. Later, it will come from clients, but again you will need to be the go-to.
Sooner or later you'll have the epiphany, so let's share it now: It's not just how smart you are, how much you know, or even how hard you work. It's how you work. Methods matter. If you can learn to practice law the way that work-givers want, you'll become their go-to resource. That's your mission, and ours is to help you.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1FTC Settles With Security Firm Over AI Claims Under Agency's Compliance Program
- 2'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
- 3Court rejects request to sideline San Jose State volleyball player on grounds she’s transgender
- 4Trump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
- 5Weil Advances 18 to Partner, Largest Class Since 2021
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250