Start 2024 By Considering The Synergy Between Retirement and Succession Planning
Attorney retirement and succession planning are critical issues that are often overlooked at the management level of law firms. A key question arises: What should come first, retirement or succession planning? Although they go hand in hand, many firms avoid addressing both.
January 05, 2024 at 08:40 AM
7 minute read
Succession PlanningThis past year, I spent time with small firms discussing their future, focusing on the topics of attorneys retiring and succession planning. These critical issues are often overlooked at the management level of law firms. A key question arises: What should come first, retirement or succession planning? Although they go hand in hand, my experience shows that many firms avoid addressing both.
Surprisingly, many attorneys of retirement age resist retiring, a contrast to the general anticipation toward it. I explored what makes attorneys unique in this regard. The author of Retirement by Design, Ida Abbott says, "Lawyers who have something to look forward to in retirement and realize they have many options ahead, readily plan for it. But some lawyers have worked so long, so hard, and so successfully, that their work has become their primary source of purpose, value and identity." From discussions with firm leaders, four main reasons for this resistance emerged:
|- Loss of identity
- Reluctance to leave
- Fears about transitioning
- Failure to succession plan
To encourage attorneys toward retirement, firms should help them grapple with what they will do next. Appointing a key leader, an outside consultant, or a coach to meet with senior attorneys starting around 60 years old can be effective. These individuals should discuss whether the attorney can afford to retire, determine if they are psychologically ready, and, most importantly, if they are emotionally prepared for the next phase. Consider these questions to engage senior attorneys:
|- How is your current health?
- If married or with a significant other, how does your spouse/partner feel about you retiring?
- Do you want to leave a legacy or spend all your money?
Retirement can be a daunting transition, so candidates need as much support as possible to move forward.
Envisioning activities like writing a mystery novel or playing tennis daily can make retirement more appealing. Firms can assist their attorneys by introducing them to new and interesting activities they can pursue post-retirement, such as:
|- Starting a new career after leaving law practice.
- Relocating to an area or country with a lower cost of living.
- Spending more time with family, especially grandchildren
As attorneys approach retirement age, the firm should encourage them to step back from regular practice and focus on other ways to use their experience. David Ernst, of Ernst + Bernick LLC, retired after 30 years of practice and became a consultant focusing on law firm succession planning, said he decided to "start consulting in this area after completing [his] own succession journey because [he] wanted to help normalize discussions around succession planning in law firms."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Training to Replace Yourself': Kessler Topaz Co-Founder Set to Retire
5 minute readThe 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
9 minute read'Clear the Runway': Bill Lee's Longtime Focus on Succession Planning
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Helping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
- 2How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
- 3A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
- 4From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Julie Cantor, Associate General Counsel at Studs, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250