As Billing Rates Soar, Law Firm Clients Move Work: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 10, 2024 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
TAKING THEIR BUSINESS ELSEWHERE - Is the rationale behind rate hikes starting to erode? We know that clients have become increasingly public about their distaste for them, but the prevailing wisdom has long been that they're a crucial tool for law firms looking to remain profitable (i.e. all of them). Now, however, some research suggests rate increases are yielding diminishing returns. According to the Thomson Reuters 2024 Report on the State of the Legal Market, published Tuesday, soaring price increases have failed to fully mitigate the effect of sagging productivity in Big Law, in part because it's gotten harder to actually collect that extra money from clients. But that's arguably not even the worst unintended consequence of skyrocketing rates: Bill Josten, strategic content manager for Thomson Reuters, told Law.com's Andrew Maloney that, in interviews with GCs, 50% of respondents said they anticipate moving work to lower-cost firms over the next 12 months, a finding he called "relatively remarkable."
INEQUALITY IN LEGAL ACADEMIA - Gender inequality remains a pervasive issue in the legal profession, particularly in academia, where women are still underrepresented in influential positions and are facing systemic bias, discrimination and harassment that limit their advancement, Law.com's Christine Charnosky reports. "The legal academy was not built for anyone other than white males," said Nicola Boothe, dean of the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law, during a discussion at the Association of American Law Schools annual meeting last week. There is reason for hope, however. According to data compiled by Kristen Konrad Tiscione, professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center, the percentage of women law school deans has grown since the 2008-09 academic year, from 20% to 35% in 2023-24.
ON THE RADAR - Private equity firm Liberty Hall announced the merger of its portfolio company Comply365 with aviation software provider Vistair Ltd. in a deal guided by Willkie Farr & Gallagher; Osborne Clarke; and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. In connection with the merger, Insight Venture Partners has joined Liberty Hall as an equal investor in the combined business. Financial terms were not disclosed. New York-based Liberty Hall was advised by a Gibson Dunn team led by partners Christopher Harding and John Pollack. Vistair, which is based in Bristol, United Kingdom, was represented by Osborne Clarke. Willkie Farr guided Insight Venture. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBottoming Out or Merging Up? Law Firms That Shuttered in 2024
A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Orange Belongs to All: U-Haul Suit Argues Rival Public Storage Cannot Claim the Color
- 2Continuing Consolidation: The Biggest Legal Tech M&As of 2024
- 3FTC Announces HSR Final Rulemaking Impacting Premerger Filings
- 4NJ Cut Down on Open Judgeships in 2024, But Dozens of Vacancies Linger
- 5How to Add PR When You’ve Already Taken an ‘L’
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250