Top Big Law Partners Are Earning More Than $2,400 Per Hour: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 11, 2024 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
ALL IN AN HOUR'S WORK - Yesterday, we told you about how Big Law rate hikes were not only failing to make up for decreased productivity and realization rates, but were also potentially causing clients to shift some of their work to lower-cost firms. So just how much are large firms charging these days? As Law.com's Dan Roe reports, recent bankruptcy filings show that Big Law rates are nearing $2,600 hourly for top partners. To be sure, the most in-demand lawyers at the top firms are always going to command major money and, at that level, most clients will happily pay. But the data does speak to how rate increases have accelerated in recent years. For example, going into 2021, leading bankruptcy firms announced single-digit rate increases: 3% for Kirkland, 8% for Latham, and 5% for Paul Weiss. Over the following three years, however, annual rate increases at Kirkland, Latham and Paul Weiss averaged 9%, 11% and 11%, respectively.
DOUBLING DOWN ON DEI - Last year's SCOTUS ruling striking down affirmative action in higher education and efforts by conservative groups to challenge the legality of diversity programs have not had the chilling effect some might have expected. That's according to the "Inclusion, Equity and Diversity C-suite Survey Report," released Wednesday by Littler Mendelson, which surveyed more than 320 senior executives. Fifty-seven percent of respondents said their organizations had expanded their DEI commitments and level of activity over the past year, even as 59% said the backlash against such programs has increased since June's high-court ruling. Ninety-one percent of respondents said the ruling had not lessened their prioritization of DEI, while 69% said the ruling had not changed their DEI approach in any way. "We're seeing many employers maintain—or even double down on—their commitment to IE&D, even as backlash spikes," Jeanine Conley Daves, a Littler office managing shareholder, told Law.com's Trudy Knockless.
ON THE RADAR - Attorneys from Latham & Watkins and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to defend Andreessen Horowitz, a California-based private equity firm, and Paradigm Operations LP, respectively, in a pending securities class action. The action, filed Dec. 17 in California Northern District Court by Gerstein Harrow LLP and Fairmark Partners, accuses the defendants of selling unregistered securities in the form of digital assets called LDO tokens. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria, is 3:23-cv-06492, Samuels v. Lido Dao et al. Stay up on the latest state and federal litigation, as well as the latest corporate deals, with Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|
|
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read‘What’s Up With Morgan & Morgan?’ Law, Advertising and a Calculated Rise
10 minute readConservative Boutiques That Backed Trump Reap Their Rewards
What Will Happen to the Nominees in Florida's Southern and Middle Districts?
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250