Patrick Bumatay appears before the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing to be a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in October 2019. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM 'Judicial Tinkering': 9th Circuit Judge Criticizes Order Blocking Homeless Encampment Sweeps
Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented from a decision that San Francisco's anti-vagrancy enforcement likely constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.
January 12, 2024 at 04:10 PM
4 minute read
Constitutional Law
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Judge Patrick Bumatay of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Thursday slammed a district court's order blocking San Francisco from enforcing ordinances that bar unhoused people from sleeping, lodging or camping on public property, calling the preliminary injunction a "radical interpretation" of the Constitution.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2NYC Mayor Eric Adams Indicted on Public Corruption Allegations
- 3'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 4Conduct Board Urges 'Swift and Severe Punishment' for Phila. Judge's Facebook Posts
- 5What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
