27. Transitioning Between Law Firm and In-House: Do More With Less Is Now Your Job Spec
It's not that the jump was a bad idea, it's just that it's not what you expected.
January 19, 2024 at 12:08 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
OK so where now? In this miniseries on career transitions, we've looked at the jump from student to associate, then from associate to partner. In both cases, we saw how it was harder than you thought. Now we look at the transition from partner to in-house, and vice versa.
Transitioning from Partner to In-House
Let's start with the jump to in-house. A common assumption, as related to us by those who have made the leap, is that everything is portable. It's not. Suppose you're a partner looking to move in house. Maybe you got the job offer from your biggest client. This is usually how it starts. Will the money be the same? No, that'll be your first surprise. You expected a differential but wow, is that really what you guys pay?
No matter, maybe money isn't the driver it once was. There's the prospect of a steady flow of interesting legal work that you don't have to find. Except that doesn't pan out either. You find that the really interesting work still goes out, even though that was never the idea, and the in-house team does the rest. Suddenly it's not clear what your purpose is.
Then, if your face fits, you'll do less lawyering and more business strategy. Still, at least it's 9 to 5. Except it's not. You'd heard the mantra "do more with less," only now it applies to you. It's your entire job spec.
It's not that the jump was a bad idea, it's just that it's not what you expected. You discover, as we explained in Lean Adviser, that the job is about not failing.
Transitioning from In-House to Partner
What about ex-GCs who move from in-house to law firms? This community tells us that they have a few things going for them. First, they usually have a captive client to bring, which is their entry ticket. Also, they usually have a great Rolla deck of GCs and business folks. They will need to convert all these assets to survive in the eat-what-you-kill environment of big law, with the sharp elbows and the relentless billing pressure.
Again, not everything is portable. Your ex-employer is your biggest potential client. But you'll know better than anyone the budgetary issues around paying your new firm enough in fees to cover your comp, overhead and profit contribution.
It turns out that the most portable asset you have is the one least recognized. It's your understanding of the GC mindset. In an era when law firms are finally starting to grapple with client service, your insights are invaluable. In all the other transitions we've looked at, the mover was under-prepared and ill-equipped. The ex-GC is the outlier.
As we say at Lean Adviser, methods matter. If you're an ex-GC you already know the importance of practicing law the way clients want, and you'll instinctively let that shape your work. You'll soon become the client's go-to person on every assignment you touch.
The next lesson, "Partner to Oblivion," wraps this miniseries on career transitioning.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLongtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
4 minute readHours After Trump Takes Office, Democratic AGs Target Birthright Citizenship Order
4 minute readHicks Johnson Promotes Lori Arakaki and Daniel Scime to Firm Partnership
2 minute readIAG Forensics & Valuation is excited to announce promotions at our firm effective 1/1/2025.
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 2The Use of Psychologists as Coaches/Trial Consultants
- 3Could This Be the Era of Client-Centricity?
- 4New York Mayor Adams Attacks Fed Prosecutor's Independence, Appeals to Trump
- 5Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250