27. Transitioning Between Law Firm and In-House: Do More With Less Is Now Your Job Spec
It's not that the jump was a bad idea, it's just that it's not what you expected.
January 19, 2024 at 12:08 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
OK so where now? In this miniseries on career transitions, we've looked at the jump from student to associate, then from associate to partner. In both cases, we saw how it was harder than you thought. Now we look at the transition from partner to in-house, and vice versa.
Transitioning from Partner to In-House
Let's start with the jump to in-house. A common assumption, as related to us by those who have made the leap, is that everything is portable. It's not. Suppose you're a partner looking to move in house. Maybe you got the job offer from your biggest client. This is usually how it starts. Will the money be the same? No, that'll be your first surprise. You expected a differential but wow, is that really what you guys pay?
No matter, maybe money isn't the driver it once was. There's the prospect of a steady flow of interesting legal work that you don't have to find. Except that doesn't pan out either. You find that the really interesting work still goes out, even though that was never the idea, and the in-house team does the rest. Suddenly it's not clear what your purpose is.
Then, if your face fits, you'll do less lawyering and more business strategy. Still, at least it's 9 to 5. Except it's not. You'd heard the mantra "do more with less," only now it applies to you. It's your entire job spec.
It's not that the jump was a bad idea, it's just that it's not what you expected. You discover, as we explained in Lean Adviser, that the job is about not failing.
Transitioning from In-House to Partner
What about ex-GCs who move from in-house to law firms? This community tells us that they have a few things going for them. First, they usually have a captive client to bring, which is their entry ticket. Also, they usually have a great Rolla deck of GCs and business folks. They will need to convert all these assets to survive in the eat-what-you-kill environment of big law, with the sharp elbows and the relentless billing pressure.
Again, not everything is portable. Your ex-employer is your biggest potential client. But you'll know better than anyone the budgetary issues around paying your new firm enough in fees to cover your comp, overhead and profit contribution.
It turns out that the most portable asset you have is the one least recognized. It's your understanding of the GC mindset. In an era when law firms are finally starting to grapple with client service, your insights are invaluable. In all the other transitions we've looked at, the mover was under-prepared and ill-equipped. The ex-GC is the outlier.
As we say at Lean Adviser, methods matter. If you're an ex-GC you already know the importance of practicing law the way clients want, and you'll instinctively let that shape your work. You'll soon become the client's go-to person on every assignment you touch.
The next lesson, "Partner to Oblivion," wraps this miniseries on career transitioning.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGroen Strokoff O'Neill, LLC adds accomplished Trial Lawyer, William "Bill" Coppol.
1 minute readCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250