Generative AI. Credit: Nataliia / Adobe Stock Lawyers Call 5th Circuit AI Proposal Vague, Potential Threat to Work-Product Privilege
The appeals court would require attorneys who used AI in drafting a filing to certify that the citations, legal analysis and any other text have "been reviewed for accuracy and approved by a human."
January 30, 2024 at 02:30 PM
5 minute read
Legal Technology
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
What You Need to Know
- The Fifth Circuit published comments it received about its proposed AI review certification rule.
- Some attorneys said the rule lacked a clear definition of what generative AI uses would need to be disclosed.
Lawyers have expressed concern with a federal appeals court's proposed artificial intelligence review certification rule, calling it vague and a potential threat to work-product privilege.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
- 2BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 4The Growing Tension—And Opportunity—in Big Law Nonequity Tiers
- 5The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
