Pacesetter Research: To AI or Not to AI?
Law firms contemplating AI in 2024 is like law firms contemplating desktop computers in 1990
February 28, 2024 at 10:37 AM
7 minute read
By now, unless your law firm is headquartered under a rock, the question of AI has arisen: to AI, or not to AI? However, as was discussed in this year's LegalWeek "Future State of the Industry" panel, a better question might be, why should you bring AI into your firm? Because your competition is using it? Because it might save you money? Because it might do something better than the way your firm currently does things? Because it might help your clients – and impress them? Because it might be important to potential lateral hires?
The truth is, any one of these is a valid reason to start using AI. What is less of a good reason to bring AI into your firm is simply for the sake of bringing AI into your firm. AI is a unique tool and one that most of us are on a learning curve with, quite frankly. We are in an experimental stage at this point very akin to the late 1980s/early 1990s when desktop computers first became widely available (for those of us old enough to remember). ALM's Pacesetter Research is focused on innovation in law, but innovation that has an impact, that makes a difference for clients. Innovation for its own sake is not just pointless, it can get in the way. Innovation is about solving problems, not admiring shiny new things.
So, how do we approach AI? It's everywhere. Whether you know it or not, you have probably already interacted with AI in some form today multiple times. How can you make it work for you in your firm? You can do online searches to see what other law firms are doing with AI, and by the way, you'll find that most think of AI as a cost (or time) saving tool. And they're not wrong – but can it do more for your firm? (Also, on a related note, will your clients soon start asking when you'll be passing those savings on to them? But that's another story.) And of course, there is the other reality that even if your firm hesitates with AI, your lawyers may not be. A Wolters Kluwer report in late 2023 found that 73% of lawyers planned on using it. What does that mean for your firm's risk profile and cyber security framework if some of your lawyers are already using AI in-house?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllALM Market Analysis Report Series: Nashville's Rapid Growth Brings Increased Competition for Law Firms
Pacesetter Research: Workplace Strategy, Opportunity for the Legal Industry?
Trending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250