Ohio State's Immunity Claim Against COVID-19 Tuition Class Action Survives State Supreme Court Scrutiny—for Now
"This case is an outlier, one arising from the rare occurrence of a worldwide pandemic. It appears that the majority reached its conclusions on jurisdiction because this is one of those unicorns. Its holding should not be universally applied. Otherwise, egregious situations caused by the state would go unchecked, despite the existence of specific statutes by which the state waives sovereign immunity," Justice Jennifer Brunner wrote in a dissenting opinion.
March 07, 2024 at 05:07 PM
5 minute read
In a 4-3 opinion, the Ohio Supreme Court majority has remanded a case to an appellate court to determine whether discretionary immunity protects The Ohio State University from a class action lawsuit filed by a student seeking a refund due to the campus's closure during the initial COVID-19 wave.
The justices heard oral arguments in September in Smith v. Ohio State University in which the parties disputed whether Ohio's Court of Claims—where the plaintiff filed the class action lawsuit seeking for a partial refund for tuition and fees paid during the pandemic—had jurisdiction to hear the case. The state high court was asked only to consider whether discretionary immunity is a jurisdictional bar or an affirmative defense bar.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/401/2023/05/United-Airlines-767x633.jpg)
COVID-19 Vaccine Suit Against United Airlines Hangs on Right-to-Sue Letter Date
3 minute read![State High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage State High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/423/2021/11/Closed-due-to-Covid-19-767x633.jpg)
State High Court Bucks Trend Favoring Insurers, Sides With Restaurants Seeking COVID-19 Coverage
![Forward-Looking Statements Don't Support Securities Case Against Peloton Following Pandemic Spike Forward-Looking Statements Don't Support Securities Case Against Peloton Following Pandemic Spike](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2022/01/Peloton-Store-2-767x633.jpg)
Forward-Looking Statements Don't Support Securities Case Against Peloton Following Pandemic Spike
2 minute read![Federal Lawsuit Seeks $400M In COVID-19 PPE Commission Revenues to Be Handed Over Federal Lawsuit Seeks $400M In COVID-19 PPE Commission Revenues to Be Handed Over](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2024/09/COVID-19-PPE-kit-767x633.jpg)
Federal Lawsuit Seeks $400M In COVID-19 PPE Commission Revenues to Be Handed Over
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1With DEI Top of Mind, Black Judges Discuss Growing Up During Segregation, Efforts to Diversify the Profession
- 2Big Law's Middle East Bet: Will It Pay Off?
- 3'Translate Across Disciplines': Paul Hastings’ New Tech Transactions Leader
- 4Milbank’s Revenue and Profits Surge Following Demand Increases Across the Board
- 5Fourth Quarter Growth in Demand and Worked Rates Coincided with Countercyclical Dip, New Report Indicates
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250