43. A Legal Assignment Is Just One Person With a Problem Asking Another Person for Help
If there's one thing we could do to improve the mental health and well-being of the legal profession as a whole, what would it be? The answer, we suggest, is empathy. In other words, to see the profession at a people level and reframe client service around empathy and human values.
March 22, 2024 at 11:39 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
The previous lesson discussed the story of the Pinsent Masons partner who passed away due to complications of an "acute mental crisis." She was not the first, and unfortunately, likely won't be the last. After the shock of such a tragedy comes the finger pointing. Some say that clients are the root cause of the mental health crisis in our industry. After all, it is they who are willing to pay such a high price for the service that they can then demand the impossible from those performing it. Some blamed law firm culture, while others took aim only at Pinsents for a host of reasons, including their response.
Some argue that the problem starts with law schools which, they note, turn out our future lawyers with enormous student debt, excellent knowledge of what the law is, but very little ability to practice it. Then along came a hypothesis which says the fault lies with the lawyers' psyche, in how they value themselves, and treat all-nighters as a badge of honor.
It's a vital discussion, and there is some truth in all the commentaries. But for all the column inches, there are no real solutions or cures. This is why, in the previous lesson, we reached out to lawyers and asked the direct question: Why don't you just turn the work away? Or at least negotiate the deadline?
It's in the interests of the client, the assignment — and most of all yourself — to say that you don't have capacity to do this job, by this deadline, at this time. If enough people were to say no, there would be a "Not Me Too" movement.
This lesson takes a holistic view, and asks this question: If there's one thing we could do to improve the mental health and well-being of the legal profession as a whole, what would it be?
The answer, we suggest, is empathy. In other words, to see the profession at a people level and reframe client service around empathy and human values. Empathy could — and should — inform the entire attorney client experience. It may be the business of law, but in the end, an assignment is just one person with a problem asking another person for help. As the client and lawyer take the journey together to solve the problem, they just need to look out for each other.
We have a Lean Adviser white paper called "Reframing The 3-Sided Market to Improve Working Wellness." This argues that there is a way to reframe the profession so it works for clients and is healthy and sustainable for lawyers. It starts by dismantling the notion that we operate in a 2-sided market: clients and lawyers. Properly analyzed, there are 3 core elements:
- Clients who have problems to solve;
- Lawyers who exist to solve the problems (and enjoy doing so); and
- Law firms who supply the lawyers to the clients as a business.
This is critical to understanding where the disconnects are. But what does this have to do with working wellness? Everything. The key to addressing the mental health crisis is to understand the disconnects, and then repair them.
The White Paper gets to our purpose as lawyers, how we value ourselves, and then takes a look at the things we weren't warned about when we signed up, and at the human cost of being a lawyer.
It concludes with a 12-point checklist for law firm leaders interested in reframing their relationships with their own lawyers and their clients. Contact Steve Salkin here for your free copy.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250