28. Who Will Offer the Better Career Path, Big Law or Mid-Market?
Mid-Market Series Part 3 The wrong firm will always be the wrong choice, but the right Mid-Market firm can offer you the perfect platform to develop your full potential and enjoy the journey.
April 12, 2024 at 12:09 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Welcome to the third part of our mini-series on Mid-Market law firms. We opened with a comparison between Big Law and Mid-Market from a client-service prism, and all the ways in which Mid-Market firms have a head start. In Part 2, we asked what happens when Big Law comes to regional towns, and how Mid-Market firms can distinguish themselves by being more agile, with lower overheads and a more client-centric approach.
Now our discussion turns to you, the attorney. Which is better for you, Big Law or Mid-Market?
The first thing we need to recognize is about choice, as in you don't always have one. But suppose you do. Suppose you're a young associate, your grades are good enough, your resume fits, and you have a choice of career path, Big Law or Mid-Market? Then what? What kind of firm will be better for you?
For sure, there will be peripheral factors to consider. Your personality, your sector interest, even your debt situation. But then you might ask yourself the most important question: Why did you become a lawyer?
If your primary driver was to amass a cash fund at 40 and then leave the profession, maybe Big Law is for you. Nothing wrong with that; your life, your call. But what if you became a lawyer because you like using your knowledge, talent and creative chops to solve complex problems? Then Mid-Market may well be a better bet, because these firms may give you more opportunity to do those things.
The counter-narrative you may hear is that if you want to act for major corporates, or do something obscure like international sovereign debt enforcement, it has to be Big Law. That used to be true. Time was, that you wouldn't see that kind of action at many Mid-Market firms. But that's all changed. As we saw last week, clients will send the work to whichever shop can demonstrate efficiency, effectiveness and price predictability. Even for high-value or complex work, Mid-Market firms can now make a compelling case.
Methods matter, and Mid-Market will often have leaner legal ops. For you, just as for any lawyer, of any seniority, in any sector, there is no more productive and healthy way of working than being lean. This won't just get you experience, it'll get you a book of business.
The wrong firm will always be the wrong choice, but the right Mid-Market firm can offer you the perfect platform to develop your full potential and enjoy the journey. Then, if you still want to try your hand at Big Law, that will be available to you and you'll be a better lawyer for the experience.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLongtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
4 minute readHours After Trump Takes Office, Democratic AGs Target Birthright Citizenship Order
4 minute readHicks Johnson Promotes Lori Arakaki and Daniel Scime to Firm Partnership
2 minute readIAG Forensics & Valuation is excited to announce promotions at our firm effective 1/1/2025.
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Brought Under NYC Gender Violence Law, Ruling Claims Barred Under State Measure
- 24th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
- 3Lawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
- 4Fellows LaBriola LLP is Pleased to Announce that Alisha Goel Has Become Associated with The Firm
- 5Law Firms Turn to 'Golden Handcuffs' to Rein In Partner Movement
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250