28. Who Will Offer the Better Career Path, Big Law or Mid-Market?
Mid-Market Series Part 3 The wrong firm will always be the wrong choice, but the right Mid-Market firm can offer you the perfect platform to develop your full potential and enjoy the journey.
April 12, 2024 at 12:09 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Welcome to the third part of our mini-series on Mid-Market law firms. We opened with a comparison between Big Law and Mid-Market from a client-service prism, and all the ways in which Mid-Market firms have a head start. In Part 2, we asked what happens when Big Law comes to regional towns, and how Mid-Market firms can distinguish themselves by being more agile, with lower overheads and a more client-centric approach.
Now our discussion turns to you, the attorney. Which is better for you, Big Law or Mid-Market?
The first thing we need to recognize is about choice, as in you don't always have one. But suppose you do. Suppose you're a young associate, your grades are good enough, your resume fits, and you have a choice of career path, Big Law or Mid-Market? Then what? What kind of firm will be better for you?
For sure, there will be peripheral factors to consider. Your personality, your sector interest, even your debt situation. But then you might ask yourself the most important question: Why did you become a lawyer?
If your primary driver was to amass a cash fund at 40 and then leave the profession, maybe Big Law is for you. Nothing wrong with that; your life, your call. But what if you became a lawyer because you like using your knowledge, talent and creative chops to solve complex problems? Then Mid-Market may well be a better bet, because these firms may give you more opportunity to do those things.
The counter-narrative you may hear is that if you want to act for major corporates, or do something obscure like international sovereign debt enforcement, it has to be Big Law. That used to be true. Time was, that you wouldn't see that kind of action at many Mid-Market firms. But that's all changed. As we saw last week, clients will send the work to whichever shop can demonstrate efficiency, effectiveness and price predictability. Even for high-value or complex work, Mid-Market firms can now make a compelling case.
Methods matter, and Mid-Market will often have leaner legal ops. For you, just as for any lawyer, of any seniority, in any sector, there is no more productive and healthy way of working than being lean. This won't just get you experience, it'll get you a book of business.
The wrong firm will always be the wrong choice, but the right Mid-Market firm can offer you the perfect platform to develop your full potential and enjoy the journey. Then, if you still want to try your hand at Big Law, that will be available to you and you'll be a better lawyer for the experience.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGroen Strokoff O'Neill, LLC adds accomplished Trial Lawyer, William "Bill" Coppol.
1 minute readCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1SEC’s Latest Enforcement Actions Fuel Demand for Big Law
- 2Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
- 3DOJ Takes on Largest NFT Scheme That Points to Larger Trend
- 4Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 5Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250