26. Madness or Masterful: The O.J. Simpson Defense Strategy Revisited
29 years on from the trial and following the April 2024 passing of O.J. Simpson, we revisit defense attorney Johnnie Cochrane's now infamous quote, and we ask the question: Was this ploy madness or masterful?
April 19, 2024 at 11:26 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
This week we take a pause before wrapping up the mid-market series to remember one of the most-watched and talked about trials in recent history. With the passing of O.J. Simpson, we go back to 1995 and "the most dramatic courtroom verdict in the history of Western civilization," as The Washington Post called it. An unprecedented 150 million people watched the verdict live on Oct. 3, 1995, according to CNN. So many people were enthralled with the trial that one company estimated the national loss of productivity at $40 billion. *
Over here at Lean Adviser, we remember the trial not just for its impact at the time but when examined through the lean law lens, the strategy by defense attorney Johnny Cochrane serves as a great example of using lean law methods in a real-life courtroom situation.
"If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit."
Was there ever a more memorable instruction given to a jury? On the face of it, this looks like a risky piece of grandstanding. If it was, then you can see the temptation. A global TV audience for the "trial of the century," all set in the "La La Land."
In this lesson, 29 years on from the trial and following the April 2024 passing of O.J. Simpson, we revisit defense attorney Johnnie Cochrane's now infamous quote, and we ask the question: Was this ploy madness or masterful?
To resolve this, we analyze this quote through a lean law prism. It turns out that "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit" was actually quite brilliant. Allow us to explain why.
It worked in securing an acquittal, which many observers thought unlikely. So there must have been some smarts behind it. But why did it work and what can we take away from it? Let's break this down into a lean tip sheet for trial lawyers everywhere.
- Ask the right question: For a law exam the right question to a jury would have been "Are you satisfied beyond all reason doubt that the defendant was guilty?" But for a real-life trial lawyer the right question was "does the glove fit?"
- Give answers dressed as questions: In theory, you should give the jury questions to resolve, with suggested right answers. But 'you must acquit' is not a question or even a suggestion. It's an instruction. It's clear, assertive and simple.
- Be selective: In a bench trial you get much less leeway to guide the areas of focus. But with a jury trial it's different. If you tell them the only place you need to look to solve the puzzle is here, and if they believe you, then it is.
- Use strategic storytelling: We often talk in Lean Adviser about the power of storytelling, because that's what people engage with and remember. But what story? This glove story was about something helpful to Cochrane. The fact that it didn't actually prove anything is strategically irrelevant. The point is, it diverted attention away from many other more awkward stories, like how the knife got there, Simpson fleeing the scene and the rest.
- Empower: Always let the tribunal take the last step and feel like they're figuring it out themselves.
- Follow the principles of lean: One of the tenets of lean law is to identify just what matters and focus on that. Communicate it within the team and to the client. Then find a way to express it concisely but clearly.
* See, Schuetz, Janice E.; Lilley, Lin S., eds. (1999). The O.J. Simpson Trials: Rhetoric, Media, and the Law. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press)
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250