30. Are New Law Firm Cultures Bridging The Generation Gap?
Generation Gap Series Part 4: Culture Law firm cultures have become more associate-friendly, and young associates have embraced this and found it easier to assimilate.
May 24, 2024 at 11:46 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
Who has to fit in with whom? Is it on the young associate to come to terms with the culture of the firm and try their best to assimilate? Or is the onus on law firms to modify their culture to make themselves more appealing and accommodating to young associates?
Once upon a time this question would generate diametrically opposing views depending on who you asked. The historic view of law firm leaders was that young associates are lucky to have the chance to work here, and only those who are strong enough and flexible enough to hack it will survive. In that bygone era, associates would disagree profoundly, much the same way that every young generation thinks they know better than their elders. But they'd suck it up and perpetuate the pattern when they are in leadership positions. After all, they went through it and now it's the new associates' turn.
Then things changed, and the first place they changed was the associates themselves. The current generation have different goals, values and aspirations. Law firms have realized that just paying them more to work the same way — and passing the cost on to already unhappy clients — is not the answer. It's not a money issue, it's deeper.
To the current generation, work-life balance doesn't mean "I'm only alive outside work." That's not why they joined the profession. These young associates want to be alive at work, not just after work. They want to spend their work-time using their talent and creativity to solve client problems. Happily, this is precisely what clients want from their lawyers.
This attitude shift has been a big driver toward a new common ground. But there are other factors, including everything we've discussed in this mini-series: work-from-home, talent wars, communication challenges and mental health. Driven by all these forces, law firm cultures have become more associate-friendly, and young associates have embraced this and found it easier to assimilate.
Yet there are still obstacles. Indeed, some of the catalysts for cultural change created problems of their own. Remote working is the most obvious example. As much as young associates love the flexibility of working from home, there is no substitute for sitting at the partner's elbow in the office, on airplanes and at client meetings.
Intriguingly, the reverse is also true. Partners are now learning modern-era skills from associates. With the rise in demand for legal project management, we're seeing that young associates are often the first to lean into lean. This gives them a vital new role on assignments — which they want — and which enlightened partners are keen for them to have. What follows is reverse mentoring, where partners learn from young associates, all of which is integral to a positive law firm culture.
In closing, let's mention the ordinary day-to-day interactions. It's obvious, but sometimes overlooked, that to interact meaningfully, partners and associates have to be in the office on the same day. Then it comes down to culture and mindset. There isn't a partner alive who's never had their concentration broken by an associate with a dumb question. But that's when the firm's culture is key . When that associate peaks their head into the partner's doorway and asks the question, a good partner takes a breath and remembers that the firm where associates are afraid to ask questions is nurturing ill-equipped lawyers and malpractice suits.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readNew Jersey Law Journal Names Mike Zogby Office Managing Partner of the Year
2 minute readClimate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250