Early Impact of the CHIPS Act
This article describes certain key developments in the period from passage of the CHIPS Act through the present day, and provides a brief survey of key grantmaking and investment activity by U.S. government agencies since passage of the Act.
May 29, 2024 at 11:53 AM
9 minute read
What You Need to Know
- The CHIPS Act was driven in part by concerns among U.S. policymakers that the U.S. semiconductor industry had fallen behind other modern manufacturing hubs abroad.
- The Act provides for a total of $52.7 billion in appropriations from 2023 through 2027.
- This year and beyond look to be a critical period for the semiconductor industry, both in the United States and worldwide.
The Creating Helpful Incentives to Protect Semiconductors Act (the CHIPS Act or the Act) was signed into law in August 2022, providing for a total of $52.7 billion in appropriations from 2023 through 2027. This article describes certain key developments in the period from passage of the CHIPS Act through the present day, including a summary of commitments by semiconductor companies to increase capital investment in the United States (possibly reflecting incentives created by the legislation). We also provide a brief survey of key grantmaking and investment activity by U.S. government agencies since passage of the Act. Finally, we discuss the Act's likely future, as well as analogous policy developments in critical East Asian manufacturing centers.
The CHIPS Act was driven in part by concerns among U.S. policymakers that the U.S. semiconductor industry had fallen behind other modern manufacturing hubs, primarily in East Asia (e.g., South Korea, Taiwan, and, to some extent, China). See, id. at 2. In light of these concerns and others, the Act was structured in large part to provide incentives and financial resources to companies who wished to expand or develop semiconductor manufacturing operations in the United States. See, id. at 6 – 10. To this end, the Act earmarked up to $38.22 billion to provide financial incentives to build, expand, and equip U.S.-based semiconductor fabrication plants, as well as other manufacturing facilities, necessary for the overall supply and value chain (e.g., packaging). See, id. at 14, 16.
The executive branch began implementing the Act soon after its passage by setting up a structure for companies to apply for financial support. In September 2022, the Department of Commerce formed the Industrial Advisory Committee (led by executives from Applied Materials and Analog Devices), whose mandate was to provide the Department with general strategic advice on the domestic semiconductor industry. By February 2023, the Department had published the first Notice of Funding Opportunity, providing concrete guidance to industry partners on how to apply for funding. See, id.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn Governor's Desk: NY 'Death Gamble' Bill That Seeks to Correct Pension Anomaly for Judges
'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
'We Are Prepared to Fight': Governor Calls Special Session to Fund Legal Attacks on Trump Policies
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Restoring Trust in the Courts Starts in New York
- 2'Pull Back the Curtain': Ex-NFL Players Seek Discovery in Lawsuit Over League's Disability Plan
- 3Tensions Run High at Final Hearing Before Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect
- 4Improper Removal to Fed. Court Leads to $100K Bill for Blue Cross Blue Shield
- 5Michael Halpern, Beloved Key West Attorney, Dies at 72
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250