Law firms hiring AI talent better hurry
Industry experts emphasize the urgent need for law firm leaders to invest in AI technologies and recruit, hire, and develop skilled AI technologists.
June 03, 2024 at 07:00 AM
4 minute read
The hottest jobs in the U.S. right now are the ones that involve expertise in the application of artificial intelligence. New AI-related job listings are up 42% since December 2022, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal on March 5, 2024, while the overall market for new IT job listings have declined by 31% over the same period.
This national HR trend is playing out in the legal industry as well. More than one-fourth (28%) of law firm leaders and Fortune 1000 executives who responded to the LexisNexis 2024 Investing in Legal Innovation Survey: The Rise of Gen AI at Top Firms & Corporations anticipate increased hiring for technologists to support AI initiatives in 2024. This forecast is even more pronounced among Am Law 200 firms, with 38% planning to increase staffing for AI-related projects this year.
"The AI boat is leaving the dock and there's a finite amount of talent in the market right now — whether that's internal or external — to help you with an AI tool implementation that makes sense for your unique set of needs," said Greg Lambert, chief knowledge services officer at Jackson Walker, in comments during a recent Wall Street Journal event for law firm managing partners. "The longer you wait, the further that boat is going to get away from the dock."
Mr. Lambert noted that law firms will be at a competitive disadvantage if they wait too long to acquire and develop the talent needed to drive their AI initiatives.
"When you finally make the determination to go forward and try to retain a consultant to help you or to hire someone internally, those resources are going to be mostly allocated already," said Mr. Lambert. "This is something that I don't think a lot of law firm leaders are thinking about. The market is already moving, so if you're standing still you are actually going backwards because everyone else is leaving you. That gap is going to be very hard to traverse."
Industry experts argue there is a pressing need for law firm leaders to think about both the AI technologies in which they want to invest and the AI technologists they wish to recruit, hire and develop.
"There is going to be a need and an expectation among corporate clients that their law firms will use generative artificial intelligence tools," said Anita Barksdale, advisory managing director in the KPMG Cyber Security practice. "Law firms need to have a workforce that can help you navigate and train these models. You're going to have to teach and train up."
Eric Talley, professor of law at Columbia Law School, points out that this talent acquisition and training should extent to associates — many of whom will come into their new firms already quite adept at using Gen AI — and that law firms should be open to the reality that their existing staff may be able to learn a thing or two from young lawyers.
"I think there's going to be kind of two-way teaching algorithm that goes on where my students who take my class teach me some things about how to do prompt engineering," said Prof. Talley. "Then I then see them moving in the direction of teaching senior associates and partners in their law firms about AI tools that are available to them."
This article was based on one of the panel discussions at the Wall Street Journal event, "What Every Managing Partner & C-Suite Leader Needs to Know About Legal AI," which took place on January 31st in New York City. Watch the entire session, Legal Leaders and Early Adopters, for more insights from industry leaders.
To read more insights and thought leadership from Lexis+ Ai, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 2With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 3Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 4Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
- 5Top 10 Developments, Lessons, and Reminders of 2024
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250