31. Is Big Law's Opulent Space a Match Made In Heaven for Associates and Clients?
Is this what boomers really want from their firm's office? Gen Z associates are much more about being socially conscious and working at principled firms and the firm's ESG profile, pro bono aspirations and DEI compliance are likely to be more important. And what about the clients?
June 05, 2024 at 11:09 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
In our recent series on the generation gap, we talked about how the work from home (WFH) debate has shifted and how law firms are trying to make the office a more attractive place to work than your home kitchen table. So it caught our eye when we saw the story about Goodwin Proctor's new office in London and we wanted to share the lean perspective. Until Goodwin Procter moved into their swanky new offices in Paternoster Square, that corner of London was best known as the location for the restaurant-based TV show "First Date." In this lesson, we ask whether it will be a match made in heaven for associates and clients.
It's certainly a bold move by Proctor, into 90,000 sq ft over three floors, for currently 236 fee earners. As reported by Law.com International, the space has been fully fitted out, and includes a dance studio, a roof terrace and view of St Paul's Cathedral.
In terms of news, this certainly makes a change from the usual stories of downsizing, hot-desking and hybrid working. Goodwin's leadership has spoken out about its strategy and vision, with emphasis on collaborative working, which pays the bills, unlike collaborative sightseeing and collaborative dancing which don't.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute readHow I Made Practice Group Chair: 'It’s a Job About People, First and Foremost,' Says Alexander Lees of Milbank
Law Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute readFormer Federal Judge Christopher Conner Joins Saxton & Stump as Attorney and Shareholder
2 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Second DCA Greenlights USF Class Certification on COVID-19 College Tuition Refunds
- 235 Years After CT's Affordable Housing Act, Progress Remains a Struggle
- 3Bankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
- 4Reality TV Couple and Pacific Palisades Neighbors Sue City of Los Angeles Over Loss of Homes to Fire
- 5Colgate Faces Class Actions Over ‘Deceptive Marketing’ of Children’s Toothpaste
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250