New survey data illustrates that law firm leaders are already moving down this road by leveraging Gen AI for improved legal drafting support. Integrating Generative AI into a Lawyer's Workflow
Legal AI — Gen AI tools trained for the legal profession — is transforming the practice of law right now, enabling lawyers at firms who are adopting these tools to draft legal documents faster than ever
July 01, 2024 at 09:15 AM
3 minute read
Law Firms - Large
Legal AI — Gen AI tools trained for the legal profession — is transforming the practice of law right now, enabling lawyers at firms who are adopting these tools to draft legal documents faster than ever, according to panelists at one of the featured sessions during a recent Wall Street Journal event for law firm managing partners that was sponsored by LexisNexis.
"Generative AI creates efficiencies, it allows for automation, it essentially allows us to do what we as lawyers want to do more than anything else, which is really excel at the expert judgment layer and application of how we work," said Ilona Logvinova, managing counsel and head of innovation for McKinsey Legal. "The question is, where can you inject automation into your workflow as lawyers?"
New survey data illustrates that law firm leaders are already moving down this road by leveraging Gen AI for improved legal drafting support.
The LexisNexis 2024 Investing in Legal Innovation Survey: The Rise of Gen AI at Top Firms & Corporations, surveyed managing partners and other senior leaders at large law firms, as well as executives in corporate legal departments at Fortune 1000 companies, to better understand the business impact of Gen AI technology on the legal industry. Our survey found that 39% of law firm leaders named "drafting documents" as one of the ways their firms plan to use AI technology, the third most popular use case cited.
The panelists at the Wall Street Journal event noted that Legal AI delivers tremendous new efficiencies in legal drafting but does not substitute technology in the place of humans. Rather, it serves as a drafting assistant and merely modifies the lawyer's role from being a "drafter" to being an "editor" of form-driven legal documents by providing them with a much better starting point.
For example, a Legal AI tool can instantly produce rough drafts of legal memos, cease and desist letters, contract clauses and client communications — all from a simple initial user prompt — that are grounded in authoritative legal content. In essence, the Gen AI technology helps to reduce the manual work involved in creating these documents and then allows the lawyer to apply their reasoning and legal judgment to refine the final product.
"Clients hire an attorney for the attorney's knowledge, experience, and ability to interpret and apply legal precedent," said Joel Murray, an attorney with McKean Smith in Portland, Oregon. "If properly developed, AI can be another means by which attorneys can increase their productivity and obtain optimal results for clients."
A growing number of law firms are making investments now in Gen AI tools built specifically for the legal profession. Our 2024 Investing in Legal Innovation Survey: The Rise of Gen AI at Top Firms & Corporations found that 53% of Am Law 200 firms have already purchased Legal AI tools and that 45% of Am Law 200 firms are using Gen AI now for legal matters.
This article was based on one of the panel discussions at the Wall Street Journal event, "What Every Managing Partner & C-Suite Leader Needs to Know About Legal AI," which took place on January 31st in New York City. Watch the entire session, Navigating Opportunities: Finding Benefits in AI Growth, for more insights from industry leaders.
To read more insights and thought leadership from Lexis+ Ai, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
On a Texas Growth Surge, Paul Hastings Signs New Leases in Houston, Dallas
3 minute read
Energy Lawyers Expect Demand for Energy Work to Stay Steady Under Second Trump Administration
3 minute read
Southeast Firm Leaders Predict Stability, Growth in Second Trump Administration
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
