'Make it Hurt': How TorHoerman Scored Groundbreaking $495M Formula Verdict
Jake Plattenberger said the jury heard evidence about his client's baby in the NICU: "this was a child medically stable and doing well and trending in the right direction before she received Abbott's product."
July 29, 2024 at 06:45 PM
4 minute read
Verdicts-SettlementsWhat You Need to Know
- The July 26 verdict is the second involving allegations that cow's milk-based infant formula causes necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC, in premature babies.
- The verdict, in St. Louis was for $95 million in compensatory damages and $400 million in punitive damages.
- Other trials are scheduled in Missouri, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C., against Abbott and another manufacturer, Mead Johnson.
Robynn Davis was in the neonatal intensive care unit soon after being born in 2021 when she was given Similac infant formula made by Abbott Laboratories Inc.
That's when she took a turn for the worse, according to Jake Plattenberger, who represents Robynn's mother, Margo Gill. And it's what might have swayed jurors who issued a $495 million verdict on July 26, he said.
"That was an important day, because the jury understood that at this point this was a child medically stable and doing well and trending in the right direction before she received Abbott's product," Plattenberger told Law.com.
The verdict, returned by a jury in St. Louis, is the first against Abbott in a case linking necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC, to cow's milk-based infant formula designed for premature babies. Sold in hospitals, not in retail stores, the formula is touted as a lifesaving alternative to breast milk, but lawsuits contend that it is linked to NEC, a gastrointestinal illness that sickens or kills premature babies.
Other trials are scheduled in Missouri, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C. Another 400 cases were coordinated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois before Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer.
Plattenberger, of TorHoerman Law in Chicago, led a trial team that included firm founder Tor Hoerman, in Edwardsville, Illinois, and lawyers from two other firms: Jack Garvey, a St. Louis partner at Stranch, Jennings & Garvey and Alan Holcomb at Turnbull, Holcomb & Lemoine in Atlanta.
Abbott, represented by James Hurst of Kirkland & Ellis in Chicago, did not respond to a request for comment. In court, Hurst told jurors that Davis had a "major hypoxic event" when she was born, causing permanent brain injuries. She suffered severe pulmonary hemorrhages and underwent surgery before receiving any of Abbott's formula, he said.
But that wasn't a "real picture" of what was going on with Davis in the hospital, Plattenberger told Law.com.
"The defendants did their best to try to paint this picture of this baby in this constant state of crisis and failing health from the time she was born and throughout," he said. "We felt that wasn't an accurate picture of what was going on with this child."
'It's a Gut Punch'
The verdict is the second involving NEC and infant formula. In March, another jury in Illinois' St. Clair County Circuit Court awarded $60 million to the mother of a premature baby who died after receiving Enfamil infant formula made by a different manufacturer, Mead Johnson.
"The trial in Illinois involved a child who did not survive," Plattenberger said. "Our trial involved a child that did survive and has lifelong severe injuries and things they'll be dealing with. The case against the defendants is always a little different: different documents, different depositions."
The Illinois case also did not involve punitive damages.
The Missouri verdict included $95 million in compensatory damages, such as medical care for Davis, who cannot walk or talk and is fed through a tube because of brain injuries caused by NEC. After finding Abbott liable and awarding compensatory damages, the jury heard brief arguments on July 26 regarding potential punitive damages.
"Finish the job. Make them pay attention. Make it hurt, because it's supposed to hurt," Plattenberger told jurors, according to the livestream of the trial by Courtroom View Network.
He referenced Abbott's billions of dollars in profits and revenues, but he told Law.com he deliberately did not give the jury a specific number for punitive damages.
"I said, 'It's up to you guys. What you think is the right number here,'" he said.
Hurst gave no figure either.
"You've sent a huge message already," he told jurors, according to Courtroom View Network. "It's a gut punch. It hurts as hard as it can hurt."
The jury came back with $400 million in punitive damages.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $795K Settlement in Class Action Over Misclassification of Delivery Drivers
Movie Theater Agrees to Pay Former Employee $137K in EEOC Discrimination Settlement
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 3Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250