'Make it Hurt': How TorHoerman Scored Groundbreaking $495M Formula Verdict
Jake Plattenberger said the jury heard evidence about his client's baby in the NICU: "this was a child medically stable and doing well and trending in the right direction before she received Abbott's product."
July 29, 2024 at 06:45 PM
4 minute read
Verdicts-SettlementsWhat You Need to Know
- The July 26 verdict is the second involving allegations that cow's milk-based infant formula causes necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC, in premature babies.
- The verdict, in St. Louis was for $95 million in compensatory damages and $400 million in punitive damages.
- Other trials are scheduled in Missouri, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C., against Abbott and another manufacturer, Mead Johnson.
Robynn Davis was in the neonatal intensive care unit soon after being born in 2021 when she was given Similac infant formula made by Abbott Laboratories Inc.
That's when she took a turn for the worse, according to Jake Plattenberger, who represents Robynn's mother, Margo Gill. And it's what might have swayed jurors who issued a $495 million verdict on July 26, he said.
"That was an important day, because the jury understood that at this point this was a child medically stable and doing well and trending in the right direction before she received Abbott's product," Plattenberger told Law.com.
The verdict, returned by a jury in St. Louis, is the first against Abbott in a case linking necrotizing enterocolitis, or NEC, to cow's milk-based infant formula designed for premature babies. Sold in hospitals, not in retail stores, the formula is touted as a lifesaving alternative to breast milk, but lawsuits contend that it is linked to NEC, a gastrointestinal illness that sickens or kills premature babies.
Other trials are scheduled in Missouri, Illinois, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C. Another 400 cases were coordinated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois before Judge Rebecca Pallmeyer.
Plattenberger, of TorHoerman Law in Chicago, led a trial team that included firm founder Tor Hoerman, in Edwardsville, Illinois, and lawyers from two other firms: Jack Garvey, a St. Louis partner at Stranch, Jennings & Garvey and Alan Holcomb at Turnbull, Holcomb & Lemoine in Atlanta.
Abbott, represented by James Hurst of Kirkland & Ellis in Chicago, did not respond to a request for comment. In court, Hurst told jurors that Davis had a "major hypoxic event" when she was born, causing permanent brain injuries. She suffered severe pulmonary hemorrhages and underwent surgery before receiving any of Abbott's formula, he said.
But that wasn't a "real picture" of what was going on with Davis in the hospital, Plattenberger told Law.com.
"The defendants did their best to try to paint this picture of this baby in this constant state of crisis and failing health from the time she was born and throughout," he said. "We felt that wasn't an accurate picture of what was going on with this child."
'It's a Gut Punch'
The verdict is the second involving NEC and infant formula. In March, another jury in Illinois' St. Clair County Circuit Court awarded $60 million to the mother of a premature baby who died after receiving Enfamil infant formula made by a different manufacturer, Mead Johnson.
"The trial in Illinois involved a child who did not survive," Plattenberger said. "Our trial involved a child that did survive and has lifelong severe injuries and things they'll be dealing with. The case against the defendants is always a little different: different documents, different depositions."
The Illinois case also did not involve punitive damages.
The Missouri verdict included $95 million in compensatory damages, such as medical care for Davis, who cannot walk or talk and is fed through a tube because of brain injuries caused by NEC. After finding Abbott liable and awarding compensatory damages, the jury heard brief arguments on July 26 regarding potential punitive damages.
"Finish the job. Make them pay attention. Make it hurt, because it's supposed to hurt," Plattenberger told jurors, according to the livestream of the trial by Courtroom View Network.
He referenced Abbott's billions of dollars in profits and revenues, but he told Law.com he deliberately did not give the jury a specific number for punitive damages.
"I said, 'It's up to you guys. What you think is the right number here,'" he said.
Hurst gave no figure either.
"You've sent a huge message already," he told jurors, according to Courtroom View Network. "It's a gut punch. It hurts as hard as it can hurt."
The jury came back with $400 million in punitive damages.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Preliminarily Approves $10M Settlement Against Citgo's 'Marriage Penalty' in Pensions Benefits
4 minute readAttorneys Dodge Florida Tort Reform Hurdles to Obtain $28.9 Million Settlement
3 minute readMoney for Legal Fees but Not for Victims? Diocese Bankruptcy Scrutinized
4 minute readYale Settles With More Than 150 Fertility Clinic Plaintiffs After Nurse Steals Fentanyl
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250