“Stated plainly, Defendant’s arguments are nothing more than a repetition of stale and unsubstantiated claims,” the jurist wrote. “This Court now reiterates for the third time, that which should already be clear—innuendo and mischaracterizations do not a conflict create. Recusal is therefore not necessary, much less required.”
August 14, 2024 at 10:52 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The judge overseeing Donald Trump’s New York criminal case has denied the former president’s third recusal motion, saying the defense has provided nothing new to consider.
Acting Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan on Tuesday slammed the defense submission as repetitive and “rife with inaccuracies.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
The County of Dallas, founded in 1846, is the second most populous county in Texas with a vibrant and diverse population of nearly three mil...
We are seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have three to six years of employee benefits experienc...
PUBLIC NOTICE FOR NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING APPOINTMENT TO PANEL OF CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEES The United States Trustee ...
Acting Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan of New York County, Criminal Term. Courtesy photo
