Federal Judge Sanctions Pittsburgh Firm for 'Campaign of Deception' in Debt Collection Disputes
"Counsel are well advised to heed one lesson from this experience in particular, among the many," Bissoon wrote. "This court is immune from gaslighting. It will not work, and attempts will be met with great disfavor."
August 15, 2024 at 05:59 PM
4 minute read
Legal Ethics and Attorney DisciplineThe original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
What You Need to Know
- A federal judge sanctioned a Pittsburgh law firm for using deceptive tactics as a basis for a pair of debt collection disputes.
- The firm had sought to catch the defendant in a FDCPA by sending handwritten letters falsely attributed to clients.
- The firm asserted its conduct was permissible because it had its clients' approval.
A Pittsburgh law firm landed itself with severe sanctions and a scathing reprimand over tactics it used in a pair of debt collection disputes.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-Prosecutor and Judge Fatally Shot During Attempted Arrest on Federal Corruption Charges
- 2'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 4NYC Mayor Eric Adams Indicted on Public Corruption Allegations
- 5What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers