Murphy held that “compelling arbitration in the present action could impair the PHRC’s interest in investigating future charges of discrimination filed by individuals who are subject to an arbitration clause.”
August 27, 2024 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
Litigation Reporter
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
An attempt from Uber to evade an employment discrimination investigation, while “creative,” did not pass legal muster, a federal judge ruled.
U.S. District Judge John F. Murphy of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on Aug. 23 threw out a lawsuit Uber filed seeking to enforce its arbitration agreement with a former employee. Murphy ruled that the ride-hailing company could not use the agreement as a means to stop an investigation by the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Join East Bay Municipal Utility District s (EBMUD s) dynamic legal team as a Legal Secretary II. The person selected for this position will ...
Berchem Moses PC, a prominent Connecticut law firm with offices in Milford and Westport, is actively recruiting candidates for the following...
Note: This position is hybrid, however, it is discretionary, and the office location is in Bradenton, Florida.Note: The salary range reflect...
Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
