The DOJ's Whistleblower Pilot Program Adds Incentives for Robust Corporate Compliance Programs
By incentivizing individuals to report misconduct through its Whistleblower Pilot Program, the DOJ has expanded its arsenal and the means by which it can identify misconduct. So wrongdoers beware — although this is not the Old West, everybody loves a good bounty.
September 11, 2024 at 11:06 AM
10 minute read
What You Need to Know
- The Whistleblower Pilot Program will provide monetary awards to whistleblowers who provide the DOJ with original and truthful information about certain types of corporate misconduct that leads to a successful asset forfeiture.
- The Pilot Program's purpose is to fill gaps in the coverage of information that the DOJ has obtained and used for its investigations and prosecutions from already-existing programs.
- Companies should review their compliance programs and internal controls to ensure that their current procedures are sufficient to effectively detect and prevent misconduct.
As Deputy Attorney General (DAG) Lisa Monaco recently observed, "[g]oing back to the days of 'Wanted' posters across the Old West, law enforcement has long offered rewards to coax tipsters out of the woodwork." On Aug. 1, 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ or Department) joined the club of federal law enforcement agencies that have adapted this approach to white-collar crime by launching its own three-year Whistleblower Pilot Program. The Whistleblower Pilot Program will provide monetary awards to whistleblowers who provide the Department with original and truthful information about certain types of corporate misconduct that leads to a successful asset forfeiture. If the success of other government whistleblower programs, such as the one administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is any measure, the DOJ can be expected to see a surge of reports alleging corruption, money laundering and other corporate fraud. If this is not enough reason for companies to take a fresh look at their compliance programs to ensure they are effective at quickly detecting and remediating misconduct, the DOJ simultaneously amended the Criminal Division's Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (Corporate Enforcement Policy) to allow companies the opportunity for full voluntary self-disclosure benefits even after the DOJ receives a whistleblower tip — so long as the company self-reports that conduct to the DOJ within 120 days of receiving an internal report and before the DOJ contacts the company. While on the one hand, the DOJ is clearly sending a message to employees that if they see something, say something, as DAG Monaco stated to companies in no uncertain terms, "[o]ur message is equally clear: knock on our door before we knock on yours."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
5 minute read'Error in Our Case Law': 9th Circuit Overturns False Claims Act First-to-File Precedent
Former Salesforce VP's Whistleblower Retaliation Suit Allowed to Proceed, Judge Rules
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1I Aim to Make a Positive Change in Everyday Interactions, Tracey Wishert Says
- 2Connecticut Is Updating its Environmental Justice Regulations
- 3Navigating Florida's Products Liability Law: Defective Products, Warnings and the Pursuit of Justice
- 4Is Mobile App Security Your Achilles’ Heel?
- 5Enemy of the State: Foreign Sovereign Immunity and Criminal Prosecutions after ‘Halkbank’
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250