Dominion Energy Accused of Terminating Employee for Remote Work Request Following Medical Leave
Despite dealing with a breast cancer diagnosis and complications from surgery, plaintiff Stephanie Arble was allegedly threatened by her manager at Dominion Energy Ohio that it would be "insubordination" if she did not come into the office on returning from medical leave.
November 13, 2024 at 11:48 AM
3 minute read
Employment LawA woman accused her former employer of firing her in retaliation for requesting to work remotely following a breast cancer diagnosis, according to a new suit filed in an Ohio federal court.
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just-filed cases in federal and state courts.
According to a complaint filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Dominion Energy Ohio is accused of threatening and terminating a high-performing employee returning from a Family and Medical Leave Act absence.
The plaintiff, Stephanie Arble, worked remotely for years before going on medical leave following a breast cancer diagnosis in early 2023. On her return, Dominion asked her to come into the office with a hybrid schedule. As she was battling cancer, Arble's doctor recommended that she limit her time spent in the office. Arble believed that based on her seniority and her medical documentation that she would be granted accommodations under the Americans with Disaiblities Act.
Arble's union representative informed her that she could remain fully remote, if she wanted. However, Arble was allegedly threatened by her manager, Ruth Rachel Przybojewski, that it would be "insubordination" if she did not come into the office.
In her complaint, Arble, 40, claimed that Dominion lied about contacting her medical personnel team about her complications from sugery earlier in the year.
In September 2023, she was terminated for alleged insubordination and "performance concerns," according to the complaint.
"[Arble] was blindsided by the termination as her disciplinary record over the past 15 years has been devoid of any significant concerns, especially those related to her performance," the complaint said.
Przybojewski reportedly stated that she wanted to hire "recent college grads" to fill Arble's position, while Dominion then hired around 20 employees, many of them "significantly younger," in the same or similar positions as Arble.
Arble sued for discrimination, failure to accomodate and retaliation under the ADA and FMLA, along with the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. Section 621, and the Ohio Laws of Discrimination, Revised Code Chapter 4112.
"[Dominion Energy] discriminated against plaintiff because of her disability by taking the following non-exhaustive list of actions: terminating her employment, retaliating against her for taking medical leave, and/or by otherwise discriminating against her in the terms, privileges and conditions of employment," the complaint said.
The suit is seeking damages for back pay and benefits, front pay, and punitive damages of no less than $75,000, along with expert witness and attorney fees.
The suit was filed by The Friedmann Firm in Hilliard, Ohio.
Dominick Kocak and Rachel Sabo Friedmann of The Friedmann Firm did not respond to a request for comment. Counsel has yet to appear for Dominion Energy Ohio in the case.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHospital Succeeds in Denying Vaccine Religious Accommodation Through 'Undue Hardship' Defense
'A Template' for Religious Accommodation: Attorney Gives Insight to $12M Win Over Employer's COVID-19 Vaccination Policies
Federal Judge Sends Novel Damages Question in Employment Dispute to State Court
5 minute readNLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome': DOJ Proposes Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250