Next Likely EU Competition Hints at Priorities in 3-Hour Confirmation Hearing
Partners watched closely as Teresa Ribera Rodríguez, a lawyer by training who has no background in antitrust, talked of the need for a new instrument to address killer acquisitions.
November 13, 2024 at 03:50 PM
3 minute read
Over a three-hour hearing in the European Parliament on Tuesday evening, Teresa Ribera Rodríguez, the EU's likely next competition chief, offered few clues about how she plans to approach her mandate over the next five years.
If confirmed as expected, the Spanish candidate will have a history-making portfolio that will see her combining both the role of chief antitrust enforcer and climate czar, as she will also be responsible for overseeing the 27-member bloc’s green energy transition.
But her appointment is being watched closely because although she is a lawyer by training, Ribera Rodríguez has no previous background in antitrust. She has held a succession of senior climate-related posts in the Spanish government.
Marc Wiggers, an Amsterdam-based partner at Loyens & Loeff, said her lack of prior competition experience would mean a learning curve for the new competition chief and might result in “a cautious enforcement start”. “However, she will have the backing from a very experienced bureaucracy which should allow her to ‘get up to speed’ rather quickly and she will of course in principle need to continue pending investigations and cases,” he said.
According to Wiggers, Donald Trump’s election and the expected shift towards an enforcement that is friendlier to Big Tech under his administration might however cause Ribera Rodríguez to pursue “a stricter EU policy towards large tech companies” over the course of her term.
In her opening statement yesterday, Ribera Rodríguez largely repeated priorities already outlined in a previous policy document meant to guide her enforcement, emphasising her intention to ensure that competition policy continues to be a “facilitator for the innovation and the competitiveness of European companies”.
Ken Daly, managing partner of Sidley Austin’s Brussels office, said Ribera Rodríguez’s comments signalled support for “building European champions in ways that merger control rules might not have allowed” under her predecessor Vestager.
He added: “The question is whether this is merely red meat for MEPs and member states concerned about sluggish growth, or whether we should expect important practical changes to how deals are vetted.”
Members of the European Parliament mostly quizzed Ribera Rodríguez, who effortlessly switched between French, English and her native Spanish, on energy transition matters as well as the recent, devastating floods in Spain yesterday, with just a few MEPS holding her feet to the fire on competition enforcement.
When Ribera Rodríguez did address competition questions, she talked about the need for both a new instrument to address killer acquisitions and the need for more resources to be able to better enforce the Digital Markets Act.
Emphasising that the recent Illumina judgement had created “an enforcement gap”, she nevertheless remained vague on the form this instrument should take. “We need to come back to assess to what extent we need a new tool because the existing tools do not provide sufficient ways to respond,” she said.
Asked how she would ensure that the EU’s competition unit was sufficiently resourced to enforce the DMA, she conceded the enforcement team was not “sufficiently sized for this purpose” and emphasised the need to find other means to structurally strengthen the Commission’s capacity in this area.
The next step in the confirmation process is for the European Parliament’s 702 members to elect the full college of commissioners during a plenary session scheduled for next week.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Related Stories
View AllYou Might Like
View All'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readPre-Internet High Court Ruling Hobbling Efforts to Keep Tech Giants from Using Below-Cost Pricing to Bury Rivals
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250