44. How Will Legal AI, Law Firms and Attorneys All Co-Exist?
Legal AI, LPM, Lean Adviser and the other transformative solutions are all built on a generic “cake mix” basis. They are “white label” products which law firms can adapt in their own image and brand accordingly. Some magic circle firms are investing in their own proprietary AI solutions, others will rent and modify, but the raw ingredients are just that, raw.
November 29, 2024 at 01:09 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
In the previous lesson, we opened our miniseries on Legal AI, looking at why clients are potty for it and identifying its big deficiency. Now, in this “Great British Bake Off” inspired lesson, we move on to one of the most frequently asked questions: How will legal AI, law firms and their attorneys all co-exist in the new ecosystem?
Let’s say you’re a talented baker, you’re expecting guests for the holidays and you need to bake a cake. As a good host, you know your guests, their preferences and needs. So let’s get baking. Happily you don’t have to grow any wheat flour, wait for chickens to lay eggs or light a fire. You have the basic assets and tools at hand, so you can go ahead and apply your talent to create your cake — in your way — for your guests.
Legal AI, LPM, Lean Adviser and the other transformative solutions all work the same way. They are all built on a generic “cake mix” basis. They are “white label” products which law firms can adapt in their own image and brand accordingly. Some magic circle firms are investing in their own proprietary AI solutions, others will rent and modify, but the raw ingredients are just that, raw.
Likewise at the lawyer level, attorneys can harness these assets to their own talent in service of the client’s problems. This is the key to understanding the future of lawyering. There will be a job for humans, but it just won't be the same job. The decades of partners building a book by getting teams of associates doing research, writing memos and doing doc reviews are coming to an end. There will still be lawyers and books of business, but lawyers will have to work in harness with legal AI.
The role of the lawyer will be defined precisely along the principles of Lean LPM (legal process management). The future lawyer will be an experienced and savvy interface between the client and the machine. Here’s our predictor sheet as to what the job of an attorney will look like:
- Specialize in the client, to understand their culture, products, people and processes (as now);
- Consult with the client to help them identify the real problem (as now);
- Understand the client’s risk appetite, manage their expectations and get aligned on what good will look like to them (as now);
- Formulate the right questions to input into legal AI;
- Analyse the output from legal AI, sense check it and adapt it for your operational needs;
- Create a project plan and get client buy-in;
- Monitor your execution of the plan, detect and correct error estates; &
- Learn and improve, just like your self-learning legal AI.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Be a Good Partner and Colleague,' Says Logan Drew of Robins Kaplan
How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'It's Not Just About Legal Expertise,' Says Alison O'Dwyer of Fullerton Beck
Adapting for Success: Strategic Insights for Law Firms in 2025 and Beyond
Trending Stories
- 1Contract Technology Provider LegalOn Launches AI-powered Playbook Tool
- 2Court of Appeals Provides Comfort to Land Use Litigants Through the Relation Back Doctrine
- 3Amid the Tragedy of the L.A. Fires, a Lesson on the Value of Good Neighbors
- 4Democracy in Focus: New York State Court of Appeals Year in Review
- 5In Vape Case, A Debate Over Forum Shopping
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250