The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision overturning a $650 million opioid judgment could have ramifications in other states and in cases involving other public nuisance claims, such as social media addiction and mass shootings.

Tuesday’s decision found that the Ohio Product Liability Act did not allow public nuisance claims against three pharmacies accused of causing the opioid crisis in two Ohio counties. Acting on a certification question from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which is reviewing the $650 million judgment, the Ohio Supreme Court focused on a 2007 tort reform amendment to the Ohio law whose definition of a product liability claim “also includes any public nuisance claim” brought under common law but resulting from the sale of a product.