The Legal Intelligencer has lost its bid to unseal the docket and court documents in a precedent-setting case brought by a woman who claims she was fired because she had an abortion, but lawyers for the paper say they are studying their options to renew the challenge.
The newspaper was not seeking to learn the name of the woman. The newspaper argued that the dockets should not be secret and that in general court documents should be open to the public.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
