For more than a decade, major corporate defense firms, particularly Mayer Brown and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, have aggressively and successfully pursued U.S. Supreme Court limits on punitive damages awards. The high court’s most recent punitive damages decision — this time in maritime law — offers new fodder for those legal strategists.

Whether the Wednesday decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, No. 07-219, reflects a new approach by the justices that could lead to additional and stricter limits on punitive awards outside the context of maritime law will have to await the next constitutional due process challenge that arrives at the high court.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]