Houston lawyer Richard N. Laminack uses words such as “silly” and “ridiculous and not true” to respond to allegations contained in a Texas state court suit that describes him as a “sexual predator” who participated in an effort to defraud fen-phen clients by overcharging them for expenses.
Laminack denies the allegations in the suit, filed July 25 by Angela Robinson, who formerly worked for Laminack at two Houston plaintiffs firms. Robinson is suing Laminack; his current firm, Laminack, Pirtle & Martines; and the O’Quinn Law Firm, formerly known as O’Quinn, Laminack & Pirtle. In 2006, Laminack and Thomas Pirtle left O’Quinn Laminack to form Laminack, Pirtle & Martines, and John O’Quinn renamed O’Quinn Laminack the O’Quinn Law Firm.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
