A Christian student group faced a tough battle before a 9th Circuit panel Tuesday in its First Amendment crusade against Hastings College of the Law. The school refused to recognize the group because it wouldn't allow gays and non-Christians to be members -- violating the school's nondiscrimination policy. But the panel's tough questions may not matter, as the judges indicated they might hold off on a decision, pending finality in another case that Chief Judge Alex Kozinski called "completely on point."
March 12, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
A Christian student group suffered wounds Tuesday in its First Amendment crusade against Hastings College of the Law.
Ultimately, though, the tough questions meted out by 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge Alex Kozinski and Judge Carlos Bea may not matter: The three-judge panel asked whether it should hold off on a decision, pending finality in another case that Kozinski called “completely on point.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
Role TitleAssociate General Counsel, Global EmploymentGrade F13Reporting ToSenior Legal Counsel, Global EmploymentProgram/Tool/ Department/U...
Ryan & Conlon, LLP, is a boutique firm specializing in insurance defense. We are a small eclectic practice with a busy and fast paced en...
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROSECUTION PARALEGAL - NEW JERSEY OR NEW YORK OFFICESProminent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office lo...
