Economic conditions have virtually all businesses looking for ways to cut costs. In this time of retrenchment, one place to look for savings is in the line item for outside legal services. Many businesses pay more than they have to for lawyers. Hourly rates at some firms have reached extreme heights, and not just for their stars. While the opportunity to reduce legal costs exists regardless of economic downturns, the current recession presents a greater need to do so and increased opportunities as law firms face intense competition.
Most legal fee disputes are private, which complicates an effort to analyze them. A recent public fee dispute arose in a securities receivership action that provides guideposts for many issues that in-house counsel face when attempting to manage and reduce legal fees. In SEC v. Byers, et al., Case No. 08-7104, slip op. at 22 (SDNY Dec. 30, 2008) — in which the authors were involved — U.S. District Judge Denny Chin, in what is known as the WexTrust matter (arising from one of the largest pre-Madoff Ponzi schemes), explained:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]